摘要
黑格尔基于绝对精神自身演变的逻辑要求所提出的思想建构的准则,在马克思那里实现了基于唯物史观阐释原则的变革性飞跃,回归历史具体的基本内涵就是始终站在现实历史的基础上构建思想体系、阐释精神历史。回到马克思历史具体的阐释原则或可提供一种对于中国经验具有方法论高度的有效解释,这体现了唯物史观阐释原则的方法论价值,也体现了马克思科学思维方法的实践意义。在中国现实面前,一些西方观点是主观的不确定性在理论思维中的表现,通过理论思维框定中国道路,自然就偏离了中国道路基于自身特点进行自我调整、自我定义的实际过程。阐释体系的建构和创造,首要地取决于阐释原则的确定,为此要消除一直困惑西方阐释学的“理解与解释”的不确定性或因人而异的多元性。“三大体系”建设从哲学方法论上讲就是学术理论的阐释体系。
The principles of ideological construction proposed by Hegel, on the basis of the logical stipulation developed from the self-evolution of the Absolute Spirit, achieved a revolutionary leap in interpretation via the historical materialism of Marx. Returning to historical specificity implies that the construction of ideological systems and interpretation of spiritual history should always be based on real history, which can be methodologically effective in explaining China's experiences. In explaining China's reality, some Western theoretical presuppositions imposed on China's path deviate from the practice in which China adjusts and defines itself in light of its own characteristics. The construction of an interpretive system relies first and foremost on the establishment of the principles of interpretation. Therefore, it is imperative to remove the uncertainty in “understanding and explanation” and the diversity deriving from personal differences which have continuously bewildered Western hermeneutics.
出处
《哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第9期11-18,126,共9页
Philosophical Research
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“改革开放以来中国特色社会主义的发展逻辑研究”(编号17ZDA003)的阶段性成果
