摘要
在我国知识产权领域的现行立法中,将侵权获益推定为实际损失的作法存在明显的不足。此举既简化了侵权获利与侵权损失之间的因果关系,与市场逻辑相悖,同时也极大地限缩了侵权获益返还救济的适用空间。侵权获益返还救济的合理运用应当以不当得利请求原理为参照。为强化对权利人利益的保护以及有效遏制侵权动因,我国应尽快在知识产权领域确立损害赔偿与不当得利返还并行适用的二元救济体系。
An obvious flaw in the current legislation on intellectual property is that the infringer's illegal profit is equated with the right holder's actual loss.The presumption simplifies the causal link between illegal profit and actual loss,which is contrary to the market logic,and limits the applicable space of disgorgement.The unjust enrichment principle could serve as a reference to reasonable application of disgorgement.To strengthen the protection of the right holder and curb the infringement motive effectively,it is necessary to establish binary relief system that integrates damages and unjust enrichment in China's intellectual property legislation.
作者
徐聪颖
XU Congying(Law School,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang 330032,China)
出处
《大连理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第4期89-95,共7页
Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目:“我国知识产权损害赔偿计算问题的实证研究”(16BFX137)
关键词
知识产权
侵权
获益返还
不当得利
损害赔偿
intellectual property
infringement
disgorgement
unjust enrichment
damages
