期刊文献+

当代中国死刑存废论争的话语解释

Discourse Interpretation on the Disputation of the Abolishment of Death Penalty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英国学者齐格蒙·鲍曼在《立法者与阐释者》一书中将知识分子区分为现代的“立法者”与后现代的“阐释者”两种类型。这其中,“立法者”类型的知识分子秉持一元主义的世界观,认为所有问题都必然有唯一正确答案,并试图通过所谓启蒙推动社会进步。在中国死刑存废论争中,部分主张死刑废止的法学学者便具有鲍曼笔下“立法者”的影子,试图将西方死刑废止观念认定为一种真理性命题并强加于民众,这是引发死刑问题上此类学者与大众观念冲突的根源。在一个多元社会之中,要有效解决这类冲突问题,就应当对法学学者的“立法者”角色予以充分反思,并尝试从“阐释者”视角对中国的死刑问题进行思考。 when discussing the role of intellectuals,Zygmunt Bauman made a distinction between modern“legislator”and post-modern“interpreters”in his Legislators and Interpreters.The intellectuals labeled as“legislators”,adhere to monism,and believe in science,progress and truth.They are certain that there must be a correct answer for any question.They also try to promote the social progress through enlightenment.In the disputation of the abolishment of death penalty in China,some scholars who approve of death penalty show the disposition of Bauman’s“legislators”,for they consider the abolishment of death penalty as a proposition with truthfulness and try to impose this idea on the masses,which aroused the ideology conflict between the elites and the masses concerning the death penalty.In a pluralistic society,in order to resolve the conflict between the scholars and the masses,we shall thoroughly reflect on the role of“legislators”played by the scholars,and try to adopt the approach of“interpreters”.
作者 尚海明 SHANG Hai-ming(Human Rights Institute,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 2019年第4期44-50,共7页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 重庆市社科规划博士培育项目(2016BS041) 重庆市教委科学研究项目(KJ1701003) 西南政法大学校级科研项目“文化多元视角下死刑与人权关系”(2017XZQN-25)
关键词 死刑存废 话语冲突 立法者 阐释者 the abolishment of death penalty verbal conflict legislator interpreters
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献145

共引文献238

;
使用帮助 返回顶部