摘要
《民法总则》第111条原则性确定个人信息受法律保护,对其是否权利、构成等内容语焉不详。《民法典人格权编(草案)》(内部征求意见稿)和《民法典人格权编(草案)》一审稿都是单章规定,前者规定隐私权和个人信息权,后者仅规定为个人信息。但两者对个人信息的界定未能与隐私等其他人格权有效区分、识别对象和标准表述不准确。在比较分析基础上,建议采纳"下定义+分类"模式,以"识别型"定义和个人敏感信息、个人一般信息分类界定个人信息,更全面地对个人信息予以界定。
Article 111 of General Provisions of the Civil Law determines in principle that personal information is protected by law,but it does not clearly state whether personal information is a right or not and what personal information consists of. The exposure draft of Personality Rights in the Civil Code and the first deliberation of Personality Rights both use a special chapter to prescribe privacy right and personal information. The former document defines personal information and privacy as a right while the latter defines them as personal information. As a consequence,their definition of personal information fails to effectively distinguish from other personal rights in that privacy right and their presentation of recognized objects and discernment criterion are inaccurate. On the basis of contrastive analysis,it is suggested that the mode of "defining and classifying"should be adopted to comprehensively define personal information in terms of "identification",the classification of sensitive personal information and general personal information.
作者
蔡唱
张雅玲
CAI Chang;ZHANG Yaling(Law School,Hainan University,Haikou 570228,Hainan,China;Law School,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,Hunan,China)
出处
《昆明理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2019年第4期1-5,共5页
Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
湖南省社会科学规划项目“民法典中个人信息体系化保护研究”(17YBA072)
关键词
个人信息
“识别型”定义
个人敏感信息
个人一般信息
personal information
identification
sensitive personal information
general personal information
