期刊文献+

Novel technique for endoscopic en bloc resection(EMR+)-Evaluation in a porcine model 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 BACKGROUND Endoscopic en bloc resection of larger polyps is relevant because risk of advanced neoplasia or malignancy correlates with tumor size. Recurrence rates after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are high and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is associated with higher complication rates in the western world. AIM To develop a modified endoscopic en bloc resection technique using an external additional working channel and novel agent for submucosal injection. METHODS EMR+ was considered as modified grasp and snare technique. For simultaneous use of a grasping and cutting device a novel additional working channel was used (AWC■, Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany). AWC■ is installed on the outer surface of the endoscope, covered with a plastic sleeve and designed for single use. For submucosal injection a new agent consisting of poloxamers was used (LiftUp■, Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany). The agent is liquid at room temperature and forms a stable and permanent gel cushion after injection. Safety of LiftUp? has been shown in a pre-clinical study in domestic pigs. LiftUp■ is commercially not yet available but approval is expected in early 2019. EMR+ was first developed ex vivo (explanted pig stomach) and subsequently evaluated in vivo (stomach, porcine model, 3 domestic pigs). Main outcome measurements were: Procedure time, macroscopic en bloc resection and adverse events. RESULTS Concept of EMR+ was first developed ex vivo (explanted pig stomach). Ex vivo, 22 resections were performed after technique was established. Median procedure time (measured from begin of injection to extraction of resection specimen) was 7 min (range 5-11, SD 1.68) and median size of resection specimens was 30 mm × 26 mm × 11 mm ex vivo. Subsequently 13 resections were performed in vivo (stomach, porcine model, 3 domestic pigs). In vivo, median procedure time (measured from begin of injection to extraction of resection specimen) was 5 min (range 3-12, SD 2.72) and median size of resection specimens w BACKGROUND Endoscopic en bloc resection of larger polyps is relevant because risk of advanced neoplasia or malignancy correlates with tumor size. Recurrence rates after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) are high and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) is associated with higher complication rates in the western world.AIM To develop a modified endoscopic en bloc resection technique using an external additional working channel and novel agent for submucosal injection.METHODS EMR+ was considered as modified grasp and snare technique. For simultaneous use of a grasping and cutting device a novel additional working channel was used(AWC~?, Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany). AWC~? is installed on the outer surface of the endoscope, covered with a plastic sleeve and designed for single use. For submucosal injection a new agent consisting of poloxamers was used(LiftUp~?, Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany). The agent is liquid at room temperature and forms a stable and permanent gel cushion after injection.Safety of LiftUp~? has been shown in a pre-clinical study in domestic pigs. LiftUp~?is commercially not yet available but approval is expected in early 2019. EMR+was first developed ex vivo(explanted pig stomach) and subsequently evaluated in vivo(stomach, porcine model, 3 domestic pigs). Main outcome measurements were: Procedure time, macroscopic en bloc resection and adverse events.RESULTS Concept of EMR+ was first developed ex vivo(explanted pig stomach). Ex vivo, 22 resections were performed after technique was established. Median procedure time(measured from begin of injection to extraction of resection specimen) was 7 min(range 5-11, SD 1.68) and median size of resection specimens was 30 mm × 26mm × 11 mm ex vivo. Subsequently 13 resections were performed in vivo(stomach, porcine model, 3 domestic pigs). In vivo, median procedure time(measured from begin of injection to extraction of resection specimen) was 5 min(range 3-12, SD 2.72) and median size of resection specimens was 35 mm × 35 mm× 11
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2019年第28期3764-3774,共11页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献48

  • 1Kojima T,Parra-Blanco A,Takahashi H,Fujita R.Outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer:review of the Japanese literature.Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:550-554; discussion 554-555. 被引量:1
  • 2Gotoda T,Kondo H,Ono H,Saito Y,Yamaguchi H,Saito D,Yokota T.A new endoscopic mucosal resection procedure using an insulation-tipped electrosurgical knife for rectal flat lesions:report of two cases.Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50:560-563. 被引量:1
  • 3Conio M,Cameron AJ,Chak A,Blanchi S,Filiberti R.Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus.Lancet Oncol 2005; 6:311-321. 被引量:1
  • 4Fukami N,Lee JH.Endoscopic treatment of large sessile and flat colorectal lesions.Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2006; 22:54-59. 被引量:1
  • 5Zlatanic J,Waye JD,Kim PS,Baiocco PJ,Gleim GW.Large sessile colonic adenomas:use of argon plasma coagulator to supplement piecemeal snare polypectomy.Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:731-735. 被引量:1
  • 6Church JM.Avoiding surgery in patients with colorectal polyps.Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46:1513-1516. 被引量:1
  • 7Jameel JK,Pillinger SH,Moncur P,Tsai HH,Duthie GS.Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the management of large colo-rectal polyps.Colorectal Dis 2006; 8:497-500. 被引量:1
  • 8Seewald S,Soehendra N.Perforation:part and parcel of endoscopic resection? Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:602-605. 被引量:1
  • 9Watanabe K,Ogata S,Kawazoe S,Watanabe K,Koyama T,Kajiwara T,Shimoda Y,Takase Y,Irie K,Mizuguchi M,Tsunada S,Iwakiri R,Fujimoto K.Clinical outcomes of EMR for gastric tumors:historical pilot evaluation between endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional mucosal resection.Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:776-782. 被引量:1
  • 10Oka S,Tanaka S,Kaneko I,Mouri R,Hirata M,Kawamura T,Yoshihara M,Chayama K.Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer.Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64:877-883. 被引量:1

共引文献7

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部