摘要
日本刑法由于对正当防卫采取了谨慎态度,因此,其有关正当防卫的处理的选项比较少。对于事后防卫,原则上只能采用整体评价原则,作为防卫过当处理。相反地,我国刑法由于有特殊防卫的规定,因此,在事后防卫的处理上,没有必要采用日本的整体评价原则。对于事后防卫,首先考虑是否适用刑法第20条第3款的特殊防卫规定;其次考虑是否适用第20条第1款的正当防卫;最后借鉴整体评价原则,将事后防卫自身以单独犯罪进行处理。
Japanese Criminal Law has a restrictive attitude towards self-defense,therefore,the available option for handling self-defense is limited.Japanese Criminal Law can only evaluate the afterwards defense in overall in principle.On the contrary,Chinese Criminal Law prescribes the special defense.So,the overall evaluation principle is unnecessary for us to handling afterwards defense.In regard to afterwards defense,the application of the special defense provisions in Article 20(3)should be considered firstly.Then,the application of the justifiable defense in Article 20(1)should be considered.Lastly,referring to the overall evaluation principle,afterwards defense should be determined as crime.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第4期13-26,共14页
Law Review
关键词
事后防卫
连续性
一体化
日本刑法
中国刑法
Afterwards Defense
Continuity
Integration
Japanese Criminal Law
Chinese Criminal Law
