期刊文献+

住院危重和普通患者的革兰阴性菌耐药性比较 被引量:1

Comparison of drug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria in critically ill and ordinary patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较住院危重和普通患者的革兰阴性菌耐药性。方法将我院收治的重症加强护理病房(ICU)患者256例设为重症组,普通病房患者324例设为普通组,使用纸片扩散法测定两组中分离出的革兰阴性菌的耐药性。结果两组主要菌株来源均为痰或肺灌洗液。重症组分离的大肠埃希菌少于普通组,鲍曼不动杆菌多于普通组(P<0.05)。重症组分离出的铜绿假单细胞菌对头孢曲松、亚胺培南、头孢吡肟的耐药性高于普通组(P<0.05);重症组分离出的大肠埃希菌对头孢曲松、头孢吡肟的耐药性高于普通组(P<0.05);重症组分离出的肺炎克雷伯菌对亚胺培南的耐药性高于普通组(P<0.05)。结论革兰阴性菌耐药性在住院危重和普通患者中存在较大差异,应根据药敏试验谨慎使用抗菌药物。 Objective To compare the drug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria in critically ill and ordinary patients.Methods A total of 256 ICU patients in our hospital were set as intensive group, and 324 patients in the general ward were set as general group. The resistance of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from the two groups was determined by Kirby-Bauer test. Results The main bacterial strain in both groups were isolated from sputum or lung lavage fluid. The Escherichia coli isolation from the intensive group was less than that isolated from the general group, and Acinetobacter baumannii was higher than that isolated from the general group (P<0.05). The resistances of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from the intensive group to ceftriaxone, imipenem and cefepime were higher than those of the general group (P<0.05);the resistances of Escherichia coli isolated from the intensive group to ceftriaxone and cefepime were higher than those of the general group (P<0.05);the resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from the intensive group to imipenem was higher than that of the general group (P<0.05). Conclusion The drug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria is significantly different between critically ill patients and ordinary patients, and antimicrobial agents should be used carefully according to drug sensitivity test.
作者 何霞辉 HE Xia-hui(120 First Aid Command Center of Huaibin County,Xinyang 464400,China)
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2019年第21期92-93,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 革兰阴性菌 药敏性 抗菌药物 Gram-negative bacteria drug susceptibility antimicrobial agents
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献36

  • 1张晋湘,陆丹倩,周峰,易建文.纸片扩散法与细菌鉴定系统的药敏结果比较研究[J].中国医师杂志,2004,6(9):1256-1257. 被引量:5
  • 2Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000[J]. N Engl J Med, 2003,348(16) ,1546-1554. 被引量:1
  • 3Digiovine B, Chenoweth C, Watts C, et al. The attributable mortality and costs of primary nosocomial bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1999, 160(3):976-981. 被引量:1
  • 4Garrouste-Orgeas M, Timsit JF, Tafflet M,et al. Excess risk of death from intensive care unit acquired nosocomial bloodstream infections: a reappraisal[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2006, 42 (8):1118-1126. 被引量:1
  • 5Vandijck DM, Hoste EA, Blot SI, et al. Dynamics of C-reactive protein and white blood cell count in critically ill patients with nosocomial Gram positive vs. Gram negative bacteremia: a historical cohort study[J]. BMC Infect Dis,2007,7:106. 被引量:1
  • 6Abe R, Oda S, Sadahiro T, et al. Gram-negative bacteremia induces greater magnitude of inflammatory response than Gram-positive bacteremia[J]. Crit Care, 2010,14(2):R27. 被引量:1
  • 7Povoa P, Coelho L, Almeida E, et al. C-reactive protein as a marker of infection in critically ill patients[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2005,11 (2) : 101-108. 被引量:1
  • 8de Jager CP, van Wijk PT, Mathoera RB, et al. Lymphocytopenia and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio predict bacteremia better than conventional infection markers in an emergency care unit[J]. Crit Care, 2010,14(5):R192. 被引量:1
  • 9Harbarth S, Holeckova K, Froidevaux C, et al. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8 in critically ill patients admitted with suspected sepsis[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001, 164(3) : 396-402. 被引量:1
  • 10Jones AE, Fiechtl JF, Brown MD, et al. Procalcitonin test in the diagnosis of bacteremia: a meta-analysis[J]. Ann Emerg Med,2007,50(1):34-41. 被引量:1

共引文献50

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部