摘要
百余年来,艺术学逐渐从美学、文学等学科中独立出来,并不断开展寻找学科身份、确立思想资源、制定理论依据以及划定知识边界的工作,艺术学学科知识一步步体制化、专业化。然而,作为自主性学科,艺术学还处于"未完成"的状态,作为艺术学之下的一级学科,艺术理论只好不断地"招商引资",借取其它学科的知识生产果实作为自己的知识学依据,比如以美学为代表的人文科学的知识和以社会学为代表的社会科学的知识。在这种处境中,各种成熟的知识系统涌入艺术理论的研究领域,以不同的视角和路径指导着艺术理论研究界做出关于艺术景观和现象的各种判断,由此形成了种种矛盾和冲突。而解决的途径在于采取一种"居间性"的思维方式,对涌入艺术理论中的各种外学科知识系统,不必仅取其一端而排斥其余,而是尽可以兼收并蓄地让所有"知识型"在艺术理论中发言。
Over the past 100 years, the discipline of Art has gradually evolved from the disciplines of aesthetics and literature, and has continued to work on the search for disciplinary orientation, the establishment of ideological resources, the formulation of theoretical basis, and the delineation of knowledge boundaries. The discipline of art is step by step institutionalized and professional. However, as an autonomous subject, the discipline of Art is still in an"unfinished"state. As a first-level discipline, Art Theory has to constantly borrow knowledge from other disciplines to produce fruit as its own knowledge. The basis of the study, such as the knowledge of the humanities represented by aesthetics and the knowledge of social science represented by sociology. In this situation, various mature knowledge systems are poured into the research of Art Theory, and different angles and paths are used to guide Art Theory research community to make various judgments about art landscapes and phenomena, thus forming various kinds of judgments.Some judgments are conflicting and contradictory. The solution is to adopt an"intermediate"way of thinking. For the various external knowledge systems that are poured into Art Theory, it is not necessary to take only one end and reject the rest, but to make all the knowledge systems could make its own voices in Art Theory.
作者
刘春阳
Liu Chunyang(School of Chinese Language and Literature, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, China)
出处
《长江学术》
CSSCI
2019年第3期50-58,共9页
Yangtze River Academic
基金
教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目“艺术学理论研究的知识依据问题”(17YJA760032)
关键词
自由天才
工匠艺术
艺术家艺术
知识战争
话语权
Liberal Genius
Craftsman’s Art
Artist’s Art
Knowledge War
Discourse Right
