期刊文献+

布托啡诺与芬太尼静脉自控镇痛的效果观察 被引量:1

Effect of butorphanol and fentanyl on patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用布托啡诺与芬太尼静脉自控镇痛的效果。方法将2016年11月-2017年11月某医院应用静脉自控镇痛的手术患者84例归入本项研究中,以所用静脉镇痛药物对患者进行分组,布托啡诺组、芬太尼组,每组均42例,统计2组术后各时间段疼痛评分、镇静评分,并记录镇痛过程中出现不良反应的情况。结果 2组术后各时间段内疼痛评分十分接近,其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);0.5~12 h时间段中布托啡诺组镇静评分显著优于芬太尼组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在24~48 h时间段中,2者镇静评分接近,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);布托啡诺组总不良反应出现几率为7.14%(3/42);芬太尼组不良反应整体发生率为23.81%(10/42),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论布托啡诺与芬太尼在静脉自控镇痛中镇痛效果相差无几,但布托啡诺镇静性更强,用药更为安全,可考虑为临床首选用药。 Objective To explore the effect of intravenous analgesia with butorphanol and fentanyl.Methods From November 2016 to November 2017,84 patients undergoing intravenous analgesia in the hospital were divided into a butorphanol group and a fentanyl group with 42 cases in each group according to the difference of analgesic drugs used in the study.The pain scores and sedation scores were counted and the adverse reactions were recorded.Results The pain score was very similar during each time period after the operation in both groups(P> 0.05).The sedation score of the butorphanol group was significantly better than that of the fentanyl group during the period of 0.5-12 hours(P< 0.05).During the period of 24-48 hours,the sedative score in the butorphanol group was close to that of the fentanyl group(P> 0.05).The incidence of total adverse reactions in the butorphanol group was 7.14%(3/42),and the incidence of total adverse reactions in the fentanyl group was 23.81%(10/42),and there was a significant difference(P< 0.05).Conclusion The analgesic effects of butorphanol and fentanyl in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia are similar,but butorphanol is more sedative and safe.Therefore,butorphanol is the first choice for clinical use.
作者 牛洪章 NIU Hong-zhang(Luoyang Oriental Hospital, Luoyang 471003, Henan, China)
出处 《中国校医》 2019年第6期445-447,共3页 Chinese Journal of School Doctor
关键词 静脉自控镇痛 布托啡诺 芬太尼 patient-controlled intravenous analgesia butorphanol fentanyl
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献43

  • 1刘幸清,胡旭东,张文礼,等.地佐辛与芬太尼分别复合氯诺昔康在骨科肩关节镜手术后病人自控镇痛的临床应用[J].中国医师杂志,2011,2(z2):127-128. 被引量:2
  • 2Sun ZT,Yang CY,Cui Z,et al.Effect of intravenous dezocine on fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction:a double-blinded,prospective,randomized,controlled trial[J].J Anesthesia,2011,25(6):860-863. 被引量:1
  • 3Farnaz Moslemi,SousanRasooli,Ali Baybordi,et al.A Comparison of Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia With Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management After Major Gynecologic Oncologic Surgeries:A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial[J].Anesth Pain Med,2015,5(5):1-5. 被引量:1
  • 4Fayed NA,Abo El-Wafa HB,Gab-Alla NM,et al.Comparison between intravenous patient controlled analgesia and patient controlled analgesia in cirrhotic patients after hepatic resection[J].Middle East J Anaesthesiol,2014,22(5):467-476. 被引量:1
  • 5DiGuisto M,Bhalla T,Martin D,et al.patient-controlled analgesia in the pediatric:morphine versus hydromorphone[J].J pain res,2014,13(7):471-475. 被引量:1
  • 6Melson TI,Boyer DL,Minkowitz HS,et al.Sufentanil sublingual tablet system VS.intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine for postoperative pain control:a randomized,active-eomparator trial[J].Pain Praet,2014,14(8):679,688. 被引量:1
  • 7Maxwell CI,Nicoara A.New developments in the treatment of acute pain afterthoracic surgery[J].Curtpin Anaesthesiol,2014,27(1):6-11. 被引量:1
  • 8Jeleazcov C,Saari TI,Ihmsen H,et al.Population pharmacokineticmodeling of hydromorphone in cardiac surgery patients during postoperative paintherapy[J].Anesthesiology,2014,120(2):378-391. 被引量:1
  • 9曹卉娟,邢建民,刘建平.视觉模拟评分法在症状类结局评价测量中的应用[J].中医杂志,2009,50(7):600-602. 被引量:799
  • 10陈勇,董理.布托啡诺联合舒芬太尼用于腹部手术术后皮下镇痛的临床观察[J].临床合理用药杂志,2010,3(4):40-41. 被引量:5

共引文献26

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部