期刊文献+

经皮肾镜取石术患者围手术期应用加速康复外科理念的探讨 被引量:14

Application of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)患者围手术期应用加速康复外科(ERAS)理念的临床价值。 方法 收集135例PCNL患者的临床资料,根据是否应用ERAS分为ERAS组和传统组。ERAS组62例患者围术期采用ERAS处理模式,传统组73例患者围术期采用传统处理模式;比较两组患者术后首次饮水时间、首次肛门排气时间、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分、下床活动和导尿管留置时间、手术并发症发生率、住院天数等的差异。 结果 ERAS组患者术后首次饮水和肛门排气时间、首次下床活动和导尿管留置时间、住院天数均短于传统组(P<0.05),术后24、48hVAS评分也低于传统组(P<0.05)。 结论 在PCNL围手术期应用ERAS指导,可明显加速术后康复,改善患者预后。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) during peri-operative period. Methods From September2016 to December2017, the clinical data of135 cases of percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients in our department were reviewed, and the cases were divided into ERAS group and regular group based on whether they were treated with ERAS or not. ERAS group patients were managed with ERAS while the regular group patients were managed with conventional method. After operation, the first drinking time, the first exhaust time, VAS score, the first bed activity time, time of indwelling catheter, incidence of complication and hospital day of the two groups were compared. Results The first drinking time, the first exhaust time, the first bed activity time, time of indwelling catheter, hospital day in the experimental group were significantly shorter than that in the regular group ( P <0.05). 24 hours and 48 hours after operation, the VAS score of ERAS group were significantly lower than that of regular group ( P < 0.05). Conclusion Application of ERAS in PCNL can enhance the recovery and improve prognosis. It is worth to be applied.
作者 张华 毛厚平 江涛 陈沁 何彦丰 陈文炜 ZHANG Hua;MAO Houping;JIANG Tao;CHEN Qin;HE Yanfeng;CHENWenwei(Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China)
出处 《福建医科大学学报》 2019年第3期187-190,共4页 Journal of Fujian Medical University
基金 福建省自然科学基金(2016J01528)
关键词 加速康复外科 围手术期护理 结石 内窥镜检查 肾造口术 经皮 enhanced recovery after surgery perioperative nursing calculi endoscopy nephrostomy, percutaneous
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献40

  • 1Knut Magne Augestad,Conor P Delaney.Postoperative ileus: Impact of pharmacological treatment,laparoscopic surgery and enhanced recovery pathways[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(17):2067-2074. 被引量:33
  • 2俞慧仙.快速康复护理在胃肠术后促功能恢复中的应用[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2011,35(5):783-785. 被引量:13
  • 3Morris DS, Wei JT, Taub DA, et al. Temporal trends in the use of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol, 2006,175 : 1731-1736. 被引量:1
  • 4Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, et al. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy : prospective study. J Endourol, 2004, 18:715-722. 被引量:1
  • 5Srivastava A, Singh KJ, Suri A, et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: are there any predictive factors? Urology, 2005, 66:38-40. 被引量:1
  • 6Munver R, Delvecchio FC, Newman GE, et al. Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol, 2001, 166 : 1242 -1246. 被引量:1
  • 7EI-NahasAR, Shokeir AA, EI-Assmy AM, et al. Colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: study of risk factors. Urology, 2006, 67:937-941. 被引量:1
  • 8Troxel SA, Low RK. Renal intrapelvic pressure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its correlation with the development of postoperative fever. J Urol, 2002, 168: 1348- 1351. 被引量:1
  • 9Margel D, Ehrlich Y, Brown N, et al. Clinical implication of routine stone culture in pereutaneous nephrolithotomy--a prospective study. Urology, 2006, 67:26-29. 被引量:1
  • 10Aghdas FS, Akhavizadegan H, Aryanpoor A, et al. Fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: contributing factors. Surg Infect ( Larchmt), 2006, 7:367-371. 被引量:1

共引文献162

同被引文献150

引证文献14

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部