摘要
作为中国特色司法制度之一,审判委员会的存在具有一定的合理性,不能因其弊端而对其全盘否定。目前对审判委员会的改革存在逻辑混乱、法律冲突等问题,尤其审判委员会的实体裁判权面临改革空间不足的问题。在以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革之下,审判委员会应实现功能重新定位与调整,将其在个案中的实体裁判权改革为法律咨询功能,同时激活其宏观职能,即实现审判委员会微观的法律咨询功能和宏观的总结审判经验、审判管理工作职能的协同发展。
As one of the judicial systems with Chinese characteristics, the existence of judicial committee has certain rationality, so it can not be totally denied because of its defects. At present, there are some problems in the reform of the trial committee, such as the confusion of logic, the conflict of laws, and so on. In particular, the substantive adjudication power of the trial committee is faced with the problem of insufficient space for reform. Under the reform of trial-centered litigation system, the trial committee should reposition and adjust its function, reform its substantive jurisdiction in individual cases into legal advisory function, and activate its macro-function at the same time. That is to realize the micro-legal advisory function of the trial committee and the macro-summary of trial experience and the coordinated development of the trial management function.
作者
李雪平
Li Xueping(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
出处
《湖北警官学院学报》
2019年第3期31-40,共10页
Journal of Hubei University of Police
基金
国家“2011计划”司法文明协同创新中心研究成果
国家社科基金重点项目“刑事庭审实质化研究”(15A FX015)
关键词
审判委员会
实体裁判权
以审判为中心
庭审实质化
法官员额制
司法责任制
Judicial Committee
Substantive Jurisdiction
Trial Centered
Substantive Trial
Judge Post System
Judicial Accountability
