摘要
笔者学习总结于振兰主任药师的工作经验,通过查阅资料,结合工作实践,在疗效、质量控制、临床使用等方面对汤剂与中药配方颗粒进行比较,探讨两者优缺点,为中药临床应用提供参考。传统的中药饮片和汤剂经过几千年的临床应用而未被取代,足以证明其科学性和独特性。中药配方颗粒较汤剂方便服用、方便携带、便于保存,但价格高,缺乏统一质量标准,临床疗效是否与汤剂等同有待深入研究。
The author summarizes the work experience of director Yu Zhenlan, combines the reference data and work practice, compares TCM herbal decoction and formula granule in terms of curative effect, quality control and clinical use. Explore the advantages and disadvantages, and provide reference for the clinical application of TCM medicine. TCM herbal decoction have not been replaced after thousands of years of clinical application, which proves their scientificity and uniqueness. TCM recipe granules is more convenient to take, carry and store than the decoction. However, it is expensive and lacks uniform quality standards. Whether the clinical efficacy is equivalent to decoction needs further study.
出处
《中医临床研究》
2019年第14期130-132,共3页
Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
基金
关于进一步做好全省五级中医药师承教育项目实施工作的通知,鲁卫中综合发[2014]5号
关键词
汤剂
中药配方颗粒
疗效
质量标准
整体观念
Decoction
TCM recipe granules
Curative effects
Quality standard
Holistic concept
