摘要
获得律师帮助权作为犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的基本诉讼人权,而《监察法(草案)》对于律师能否介入职务犯罪调查程序未予明示,学界对此具有较大争议。律师介入职务犯罪调查程序不仅是被调查人人权保障的需要,也有利于法制改革的协调,以及提升调查程序本身的正当性。而对于律师介入调查程序的可行性路径设计,宜从五方面予以把握:一是律师介入的前提,即是要求监察委调查程序分离;二是为避免被调查人在获得律师帮助上出现时限真空或断层,应坚持值班律师与委托律师并轨介入调查程序;三是律师介入时限点与介入深度;四是办案机关人员人为阻碍律师介入的救济;最后则是在律师介入调查程序的立法进路方面,宜选择指引性立法,使《刑事诉讼法》作为《监察法》必要的补充规范。
It' s sbasic right for suspects and defendants who can acquire lawyers help. Whereas,the udraft of supervision law” has no specified rules for the investigation procedure, which raised controversy. Only if lawyers intervene in the investigation procedure , the human rights for dependents are better to protect, the legal reform will be more efficient. There are five ways be designed for the procedure of lawyers intervene in the investigation. The first step, the supervisory committee should have a separated procedure. The second step,Watch bar and mandatory lawyers take part in the procedure together, insuring respondents can get law-yers help sufficiently. The third step, the lawyers should be the limit of their involvement. The fourth step, the remedy for officials intervention. For the last, having a legislation - perfect, the " criminal procedure law'' become the supplement of usupervision law”.
作者
黄小龙
章浩
Huang Xiaolong;Zhang Hao
出处
《湘江青年法学》
2016年第2期185-198,共14页
Law Journal of Xiangjiang Youth
基金
衡阳市社会科学基金项目“监察委员会职务犯罪留置权监督制约机制研究”(2017D126).
关键词
职务犯罪调查权
职务犯罪调查程序
律师介入
the right for duty -crime investigation
the procedure for duty - crime investigation
the intervention of lawyers
