期刊文献+

制度同构和组织身份视角下的最佳差异化选择——基于商学院使命愿景的文本分析 被引量:7

The Optimal Distinctiveness from the Perspectives of Institutional Isomorphism and Organizational Identity——A Text Analysis of Missions and Visions of Business Schools
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对成功取得AACSB、EQUIS或AMBA等几种主要国际标准认证的45所中国大陆商学院使命和愿景的文本分析,结合制度同构与组织身份两种视角,探究这些商学院的最佳差异化选择。研究表明:大陆商学院使命和愿景在形式上倾向于被动"求同",文化-认知要素带来的同构效应比较显著;在意义上偏向于有意识地"存异",独特性特征带来的差异化效应更为显著。具有一般性的特征是通过形式上的"求同"和意义上的"存异",实现最佳差异化。 By analyzing the texts about mission and vision of 45 business schools who have successfully obtained international certifications such as AACSB,EQUIS or AMBA in China's Mainland,this research attempts to investigate the optimal differentiation choice from the perspective of institutional isomorphism and organizational identity.The results indicate that the form of the mission and vision is passively inclined to“seeking common”while the meaning of them consciously tends to be“shelving differences”.Compared with the regulatory and normative elements,the isomorphic effect brought by the cultural-cognitive elements is more significant.Besides,it is more significant that distinctive characters bring the differentiated effect rather than central or enduring characters.Therefore,we can conclude that organizations generally achieve the optimal distinct through“seeking common”in the form and“shelving differences”in the meaning.
作者 王利平 何金露 WANG Liping;HE Jinlu(Renmin University of China,Beijing,China)
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期801-809,共9页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家社会科学基金资助重点项目(14AGL002)
关键词 商学院 使命愿景 制度同构 组织身份 最佳差异化 business school mission&vision institutional isomorphism organizational identity optimal distinctiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献50

  • 1朱煜明,郭鹏,田庆峰.专业化、特色化MBA教育:中国MBA教育的新趋势[J].西北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,24(4):80-83. 被引量:8
  • 2俞明南,刘俊美,董大海.MBA课程体系调整与管理思维的培养[J].学位与研究生教育,2005(2):32-36. 被引量:10
  • 3奥尔特加 加塞特.大学的使命[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001.. 被引量:12
  • 4BENNIS W G,O'TOOLE J.How Business Schools Lost Their Way[J].Harvard Business Review,2005,83(5):96-104. 被引量:1
  • 5DeANGELO H,DeANGELO L,ZIMMERMAN J L.What's Really Wrong With U.S.Business Schools?[R].Los Angeles:University of Southern California,2005. 被引量:1
  • 6KIESER A,LEINER L.Why the Rigour-relevance Gap in Management Research Is Unbridgeable[J].Journal of Management Studies,2009,46(3):516-533. 被引量:1
  • 7HODGKINSON G P,ROUSSEAU D M.Bridging the Rigour-relevance Gap in Management Research:It's Already Happening![J] Journal of Management Studies,2009,46(3):534-546. 被引量:1
  • 8STARKEY K,HATCHUEL A,TEMPEST S.Management Research and the New Logics of Discovery and Engagement[J].Journal of Management Studies,2009,46(3):547-558. 被引量:1
  • 9LAWRENCEA S,SHARMAB U.Commodification of Education and Academic Labour-Using the Balanced Scorecard in a University Setting[J].Critical Perspectives on Accounting,2002,13(5/6):661-677. 被引量:1
  • 10WILLMOTT H.Managing the Academics:Commodification and Control in the Development of University Education in the U.K.[J].Human Relations,1995,48(9):993-1 027. 被引量:1

共引文献185

同被引文献62

引证文献7

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部