摘要
我国《著作权法》采取了"作品类型法定"的模式,限定了作品的表现形式,为著作权权利内容法定奠定了基础,有助于明晰权利界限、维护交易安全。《伯尔尼公约》虽然对作品采取了开放式定义,但不能成为法院突破《著作权法》规定的作品类型的依据。同时《伯尔尼公约》对作品类型的列举对于确定成员国保护源自其他成员国作品的义务具有重要意义。法院自行创设新的作品类型或者不合理地扩大解释某类作品的内涵,都会导致我国与其他《伯尔尼公约》成员国在保护义务方面的不对等,并不足取。
China’s Copyright Law exhaustively lists specific types of works and limits the forms of expression of works,which serves as the basis of numerus clausus of copyright and contributes to a clear boundary of exclusive rights and the safety of transaction.The open-ended definition of work adopted by the Berne Convention shall not be the legal ground for courts to break the Copyright Law’s exhaustive list of works.On the contrast,the enumeration of types of work in the Berne Convention is very important for a member country to define the scope of obligation to protect works originate in other member countries.By recognizing a new type of work outside the exhaustive list of works in the Copyright Law or making unreasonable expansive interpretation of the meaning of an existing type of work,the court will create unbalanced obligations between China and other member countries in protecting works,and such a consequence is unacceptable.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第3期10-26,共17页
Law Review
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"网络游戏产业良性发展的版权保障研究"(19YJA8200040)的初步成果
关键词
著作权法定
作品类型法定
美术作品
国民待遇
Numerus Clausus of Copyright
Numerus Clausus of Types of Work
Works of Fine Arts
National Treatment
