期刊文献+

CIN Ⅱ和Ⅲ级术后HPV转阴患者再次HR-HPV感染的危险因素Logistic回归分析 被引量:2

Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for HR-HPV reinfection in patients with negative HPV after CIN Ⅱ and Ⅲ operation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)Ⅱ和Ⅲ级术后人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)转阴患者再次感染高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HRHPV)的危险因素。方法对医院2016年5月至2018年7月收治的260例CIN Ⅱ和Ⅲ级术后HPV转阴患者的资料进行回顾性分析,患者术后均定期复查。统计患者一般资料及再次HR-HPV感染的发生情况并分析其危险因素。结果本组患者术后共22例再次HR-HPV感染,平均随访时间(8.92±1.10)个月;发生组受教育年限、间接接触、非单一性伴侣、合并阴道炎、有入住酒店经历、术后未使用干扰素者构成比均高于未发生组(P<0.05),且上述因素均为术后再次HR-HPV感染的独立危险因素。结论 CIN Ⅱ和Ⅲ级术后HPV转阴患者仍存在再次HR-HPV感染风险,危险因素较多,故应加强防控,从各个方面控制再次HR-HPV感染的风险。 Objective To explore the risk factors of reinfection of high-risk human papillomavirus(HR-HPV) in patients with negative human papillomavirus(HPV) after cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN) Ⅱ and Ⅲ operation.Methods A retrospective analysis study was made on 260 patients with negative HPV after CIN Ⅱ and Ⅲ operation in our hospital from May 2016 to July 2018. All patients were reviewed regularly after operation. The general information and HR-HPV reinfection of patients were counted, and the risk factors were analyzed. Results There were 22 cases reinfection of HR-HPV after operation in this group. The average follow-up time was(8.92 ±1.10) months. The proportions of patients with years of education, indirect contact non-single sexual partner, vaginitis, hotel stay, and no use of interferon in the occurrence group were higher than those in the non-occurrence group(P<0.05), and above factors were independent risk factors for HR-HPV infection after operation. Conclusion There is still a risk of HR-HPV reinfection in patients with negative HPV after CIN Ⅱ and Ⅲ operation. There are many risk factors, so prevention and control should be strengthened to control the risk of of HR-HPV reinfection in all aspects.
作者 张倩丽 ZHANG Qian-Li(Pucheng County Hospital, Weinan 715500, China)
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2019年第16期103-104,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 宫颈上皮内瘤变 人乳头瘤病毒 危险因素 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia human papillomavirus risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献97

  • 1彭雪,胡丽娜.HPV感染及危险因素的研究[J].实用妇产科杂志,2010,26(3):168-170. 被引量:37
  • 2曾转萍,陈凤,刘彬,黄曼妮,张洵,潘秦镜,赵芳辉,戎寿德,乔友林.山西省宫颈癌高发区宫颈癌的年龄分布[J].广东药学院学报,2005,21(1):70-72. 被引量:26
  • 3Siriaree S, Sris O J, Kiet PC, et al. High 2 grade squamous intraepitheli- al lesi on with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop electrosurgical excision : what should a clinician do [ J ]. Asian Pac J Cancer Res ,2006,7:463 - 466. 被引量:1
  • 4Soutter WP, Barros LA,Fletcher A,et al. Invasive cervical cancer af- ter conservative therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[ J ]. Lan- cet, 1997,349:978 - 980. 被引量:1
  • 5Fuste P, Bellosillo B, Santamaria X, et al. HPV determination in the control after LEEP due to CIN2/3 ; Prospective study and predictive Mode[ J]. Inter J Gynecol Pathol ,2009 ,28 :120 - 126. 被引量:1
  • 6Kreimer AR, Guido RS, Solomon D, et al. Human papillomavirus tes- ting following loop el ectrosurgical excision procedure identifies women at risk posttreatment cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 dis- ease [ J ]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prey,2006,15 : 908 - 914. 被引量:1
  • 7Ghaem-Magham IS, Sag IS, Majeed G, et al. Incomplete excisionof cervical in traepithelial neop|asia and risk of treatment failure : a meta-analysis [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2007,8 ( 11 ) :985-993. 被引量:1
  • 8Jain S, Tseng CJ, Horng SG, et al. Negative predictive value of human papillom avirus test following eonization of the uterine cervix [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2001,82( 1 ) :177-180. 被引量:1
  • 9Sandweiss L, Thompson A, Natarajan S. Cervial Leep marginstatus and post-LEEP Pap smear follow-up [ J ]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2008,1 O0 ( 3 ) :284-285. 被引量:1
  • 10Kyehyun N, Sooho C, Jeongsig K, et al. Factors associated with HPV persistence after conization in patients with negative margins [J] J Gynecol Oncology, 2009,20(2) :91-95. 被引量:1

共引文献134

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部