摘要
作为明初吴中文人的代表,诗人高启一直是研究者关注的重点,然而细查高启诗歌相关研究,研究者向来径取最权威、最完备的《高青丘集》加以阐发,此举恐怕会有疏漏。若以高启现存早年别集《姑苏杂咏》为纲,与其侄所刊之《缶鸣集》、四库本《高太史大全集》及今人整理的《高青丘集》进行比对,并和其他选录高启诗歌的选集、类书相互参照,便可弥补传统全集因为所据底本历时弥久、辗转多方而存在的历时性面貌不全之憾,对其作品内容有更加清晰的把控,让我们明了历时性在中国古代文学研究领域的重要性。故而在研究单个作家时,有必要兼顾比全集更切近当时时况的单刻别集。
As a representative of Wu Zhong Group in early Ming Dynasty, the poet Gao Qi has always been the major concern for researchers. However, the researchers have always taken the most authoritative and complete version Collection of Gao Qingqiu,to elaborate on Gao Qiu’s poems, which may have some omissions. If we take Gao Qi’s existing collection like Gu Su Za Yong as an outline, compare it with Fo Ming Collection,Gao Tai Shi Complete Works and Gaoqingqiu Collection,Which collated by present people,consult with other collections and books of Gaoqi’s poems, we can make up for the incompleteness of the diachronic features of the traditional complete works, which are based on the long-lasting and numerous texts. Then we may have a clearer control over the content of his works, so that we can understand the importance of diachronicity in the research field of ancient Chinese literature. Therefore, when we studying individual writers, it is necessary to pay more attenti.
作者
傅笔涵
FU Bi-han(Ancient Chinese Literature Research Center, Fudan University of China, Shanghai 200433)
出处
《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2019年第5期106-110,115,共6页
Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词
姑苏杂咏
高启
高青丘集
单刻别集
历时性研究
Gu Su Za Yong
Gao Qi
Gao Qingqiu Collection
Single-moment Collection
Diachronic Research
