期刊文献+

PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂对比化疗一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的Meta分析 被引量:12

Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Versus Chemotherapy in First-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂对比化疗一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及安全性。方法通过Web of science等国内外数据库,ASCO会议摘要及杂志筛选文献,进行Meta分析。结果纳入7项RCT研究,4 101例患者,荟萃分析显示抑制剂联合化疗对比化疗可显著延长患者的PFS(HR=0.59, 95%CI:0.50~0.70,P<0.00001)、OS(HR=0.65, 95%CI:0.46~0.92,P=0.02)及ORR(RR=1.72, 95%CI:1.13~2.62,P=0.01)。亚组分析显示,抑制剂联合化疗可显著延长PFS及OS,且PD-L1表达程度越高,疗效获益越显著。而单药抑制剂对比化疗在延长晚期NSCLC患者的PFS(HR=0.87, 95%CI:0.57~1.31, P=0.50)、OS(HR=0.82, 95%CI:0.65~1.03, P=0.09)及提高ORR(RR=1.12, 95%CI:0.55~2.28, P=0.76)方面两组差异无统计学意义。与化疗相比,单药抑制剂一线治疗PD-L1高表达的晚期NSCLC患者可显著延长OS,但在延长PFS方面未见明显优势。与化疗组相比,抑制剂联合化疗组3~4级不良反应发生率无明显改善(HR=1.09,95%CI:0.99~1.20,P=0.09),而单药PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂组3~4级不良反应发生率低(RR=0.43,95%CI:0.36~0.52, P<0.00001)。结论 PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合化疗一线治疗晚期NSCLC患者疗效优于化疗方案;PD-L1高表达者单药PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂可作为一线治疗的优先选择,且具有良好的安全性。 Objective To review the effectiveness and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor versus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Methods Relevant literatures were searched through Web of Science database, ASCO meeting abstract, journals, etc. for meta-analysis.Results Totally 7 RCTs including 4101 patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis showed that compared with chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy significantly prolonged PFS(HR=0.59, 95%CI: 0.59-0.70, P<0.00001), OS(HR=0.65, 95%CI: 0.65-0.92, P=0.02) and ORR(RR=1.72,95%CI: 1.13-2.62, P=0.01). Subgroup analysis showed PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy could significantly prolong PFS and OS, compared with chemotherapy. The higher PD-L1 expression was, the more significant the curative effect was. There was no statistical significance in prolonging PFS(HR=0.87,95%CI: 0.57-1.31, P=0.50), OS(HR=0.82, 95%CI: 0.65-1.03, P=0.09) or increasing ORR(RR=1.12,95%CI: 0.55-2.28, P=0.76) between single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and chemotherapy. Compared with chemotherapy, single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in the first-line treatment could significantly prolong the OS of advanced NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse effect was not statistically significant different between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy group and chemotherapy group(HR=1.09, 95%CI: 0.99-1.20, P=0.09), while that in single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor group was lower(RR=0.43, 95%CI: 0.36-0.52, P<0.00001). Conclusion Compared with chemotherapy,PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment on advanced NSCLC patients is more effective;single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor should be used as the first-line treatment preferentially on advanced NSCLC patient with high PD-L1 expression.
作者 魏瑜 张莉 WEI Yu;ZHANG Li(VIP Department of Internal Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054, China)
出处 《肿瘤防治研究》 CAS CSCD 2019年第5期440-446,共7页 Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment
关键词 PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂 化疗 一线治疗 晚期非小细胞肺癌 META分析 PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor Chemotherapy First-line treatment Advanced non-small cell lung cancer Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1Schiller JH, Harrington D. Belani CP,et al. Comparison of fourchemotherapy regimens for advanced non small cell lung cancer[J]. . N Engl J Med,2002,346(2) :92-98. 被引量:1
  • 2Shepherd FA,Dancey J ,Ramlau R,et al. Prospective randomizedtrial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients withnon- small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-basedchemotherapy[J]. J Clin Oncol>2000.18(10) :2095-2103. 被引量:1
  • 3De Marinis F.Pereira JR,Fossella F,et al. Lung cancer symptomscale outcomes in relation to standard efficacy measures:an anal-ysis of the phase DI study of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in ad-vanced non-small cell lung cancer [J]. J Thorac Oncol,2008,3(1):30-36. 被引量:1
  • 4Marina CG,Olga M,Massimo B,et al. Erlotinib versus docetaxelas second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small celllung cancer and wild-type EGFR tumours (TAILOR) :a random-ised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol,2013,14(10) :981-988. 被引量:1
  • 5Weiss JM, Stinchcombe TE. Second-line therapy for advancedNSCLC[J]. Oncologist,2013,18(8) : 947-953. 被引量:1
  • 6Parmar MK,Torri V, Stewart L, et al. Extracting summary sta-tistics to perform meta-analysis of the published literature forsurvival endpoints[J]. Stat Med,1998,17(24) :2815-2834. 被引量:1
  • 7Altman DG,Bland JM. Interaction revisited. the difference between twoestimates[J]. BMJ,2003,326(7382) :219. 被引量:1
  • 8Ardizzoni A, Tiseo M, Boni L, et al. Pemetrexed versus pemetrexedand carboplatin as second-line chemotherapy in advanced non-smallcell lung cancer: results of the GOIRC 02-2006 randomized phase IIstudy and pooled analysis with the NVALT7 trial[J], J Clin Oncol,2012,30(36):4501-4507. 被引量:1
  • 9Smit EF,Burgers SA, Biesma B, et al. Randomized phase II andpharmacogenetic study of pemetrexed compared with pemetrexedplus Carboplatin in pretreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol,2009,27(12) :2038-2045. 被引量:1
  • 10Pallis AG,Agelaki S. Agelidou A, et al. A randomized phase IEstudy of the docetaxel/carboplatin combination versus docetaxelsingle agent as second line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer[J]. BMC Cancer, 2010.10.1):1-8. 被引量:1

共引文献12

同被引文献121

引证文献12

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部