摘要
《合同法》第167条第1款的立法初衷主要在于保护买受人,其性质为强制性规定。与域外立法例相比,该款表述具有一定特殊性,带来解释上的困扰。第167条第1款所规定之解除权,应通过整体类推的法律漏洞填补方法,补足其缺失的构成要件。通过反对解释,第167条第1款作为一项特别规定,具有解除权约款限制与一般法定解除权排除两项功能,惟对于后者,需注意其排除范围。就立法论而言,分期付款买卖合同的法律规制应着眼于消费者合同,民商合一下的合同立法仍应注意商事合同与消费者合同的区别。
Article 167,paragraph 1,of the Contract Law is intended to protect the buyer,and it is a mandatory provisions.Compared with the extraterritorial legislation,the expression of this provision is special,it is difficult to explain this provision.Article 167,paragraph 1,has a flaw and must be filled.The right of right of terminating the contract in Article 167,paragraph 1,should be filled by the method of overall analogy to make up for the missing elements.Paragraph 1 of Article 167,as a special provision,has two functions:the limitation of the right to rescind the treaty and the exclusion of the general legal right to rescind the treaty.However,for the latter,we should pay attention to its exclusion scope.As far as legislation is concerned,the legal regulation of installment sales contract should focus on consumer contract,and the legislation of contract with civil and commercial cooperation should still pay attention to the difference between commercial contract and consumer contract.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第3期122-136,共15页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
中国民法学研究会2017年青年学者项目(2017MFXH001)
关键词
分期付款买卖
解除权
类推适用
民商合一
installment payment
right to terminate the contract
application by analogy
civil and commercial unity
