期刊文献+

UTN与MIPPO治疗胫骨开放性骨折(Gustilo Ⅰ型)疗效的对比研究 被引量:3

Comparsion and research of clinical effect of UTN and MIPPO in treatment of open tibial fractures(Gustilo type Ⅰ)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比研究非扩髓交锁髓内钉(Unreamed Tibial Nail,UTN)与微创经皮钢板内固定术(Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plateosteosynthesis,MIPPO)治疗GustiloⅠ型胫骨开放性骨折的临床疗效。方法采用随机数字表法将本院2012年1月至2015年12月收入的90例GustiloⅠ型胫骨开放性骨折患者分为采取UTN治疗的UTN组48例及采取MIPPO治疗的MIPPO组42例,对比两组临床疗效。结果两组术中出血量、C臂照射次数、住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),UTN组手术时间长于MIPPO组,骨折愈合时间短于MIPPO组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗前两组Johner-Wruhs评分无明显统计学差异,治疗后差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05);UTN组骨折畸形愈合率高于MIPPO组,创口感染发生率低于MIPPO组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在GustiloⅠ型胫骨开放性骨折的治疗中UTN与MIPPO均能够取得理想的疗效,临床可根据患者实际情况合理选用。 Objective To compare and study the clinical effects of unreamedtibial nail(UTN) and minimally invasive percutaneous pla-teosteosynthesis(MIPPO) in treatment of open tibial fracture of Gustilo type Ⅰ. Methods 90 cases with open tibial fracture of Gustilo type Ⅰ admitted to our hospital from January,2012 to December,2015 were divided into UTN group of 48 cases(were treated with UTN)and and MIPPO group of 42 cases(were treated with MIPPO) by the random number table method.The clinical effects of two groups were compared. Results There were no significant differences in intraoperative bleeding volume, C arm irradiation times and hospitalization time between the two groups( P>0.05).The operation time in the UTN group was longer than that in the MIPPO group, and the healing time of fracture was shorter than that in the MIPPO group,and the differencesweresignificant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in Johner-Wruhs score between the two groups before treatment,and there was no significant difference after treatment(P>0.05).The rate of fracture malunion in UTN group was higher than that in MIPPO group, and the incidence of wound infection was lower than that in MIPPO group,and the differencesweresignificant( P <0.05). Conclusion The UTN and MIPPO could achieve ideal results in treatment of Gustilo type Ⅰ open tibial fracture,which can be reasonably selected according to the actual situation of patients in clinical.
作者 陈望龙 季滢瑶 CHEN Wanglong;JI Yingyao(Yueqing People's Hospital,Zhejiang 325600,China)
出处 《浙江创伤外科》 2019年第2期227-229,共3页 Zhejiang Journal of Traumatic Surgery
基金 浙江省温州市2018年医药卫生科学研究项目(2018B31)
关键词 胫骨开放性骨折 非扩髓交锁髓内钉 微创经皮钢板内固定术 Johner-Wruhs评分 Open tibial fracture Unreamed tibial nail Minimally invasive percutaneous plateosteosynthesis Johner-Wruhs score
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献31

  • 1王志坤,曾兴栋,谢文伟,余占洪,夏虹,王非.胫骨中下段骨折内固定术后钢板断裂的原因分析及预防[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2013,28(S1):31-32. 被引量:13
  • 2仲飙,潘垚,罗从风,曾炳芳.胫骨干骨折髓内钉治疗后膝关节痛的临床研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(10):1109-1111. 被引量:47
  • 3Busse JW.Current management of tibial shaft fractures-A survey of450 Canadian orthopedic trauma surgeons[J].Acta Orthopaedica,2008,79(5):689-694. 被引量:1
  • 4Esan O.Comparison of unreamed interlocking nail and external fixation in open tibia shaft fracture management[J].West Afr J Med,2014,33(1):16-20. 被引量:1
  • 5Shao Y.Meta-analysis of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for open tibial fractures[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2014,1:9. 被引量:1
  • 6Agrawal A.Primary nailing in the open fractures of the tibia-is it worth[J].J Clin Diagn Res,2013,7(6):1125-1130. 被引量:1
  • 7Tielinen LJE,Undahl EJ.Tukiainen,Acute unreamed intramedullary nailing and soft tissue reconstruction with muscle flaps for the treatment of severe open tibial shaft fractures[J].Injury Int J Care Injured,2007,38(8):906-912. 被引量:1
  • 8Tabatabaei SH.Arti A.Mahboobi,Treatment of open tibial fractures:Comparison between unreamed and reamed nailing A prospective randomized trial[J].Pakistan J Med Sci,2012,28(5):917-920. 被引量:1
  • 9Salem KH.Critical analysis of tibial fracture healing following unreamed nailing[J].Int Orthop,2012,36(7):1471-1477. 被引量:1
  • 10Fanian H,Dehghani M.Anterior knee pain after unreamed intramedullary nailing of the tibia[J].J Rese Med Scie,2008,13(5):260-263. 被引量:1

共引文献66

同被引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部