摘要
目的构建一个基于文献计量学的医学论文评价体系。方法以医学论文为研究对象,通过专家调查法确定论文类型、期刊类型、他引次数、影响因子、期刊分区五个评价指标入选,利用层次分析法确定评价体系中各个评价指标的权重。最后选用具有高水平的同行评价指标F1000论文来给予实例分析验证。结果医学论文评价体系得分与F1000论文推荐情况基本保持一致。结论在医学论文评价中以文献计量学指标构建的定量评价体系来代替同行定性评价具有可行性。
Objective Constructing a medical paper evaluation system based on bibliometrics. Methods Taking medical papers as the research object, five evaluation indexes were selected by expert investigation, including paper type, periodical type, number of other citations, impact factors and periodical division. The weight of evaluation index is determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). At last a high level of peer evaluation index F1000 is used to give an example analysis and verification. Results The score of medical papers evaluation system is basically consistent with the recommendation of F1000 papers. Conclusions It is feasible to replace peer qualitative evaluation with quantitative evaluation system based on Bibliometric index in medical paper evaluation.
作者
王红霞
Wang Hongxia(Department of library, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215004, China)
出处
《中华医学科研管理杂志》
2019年第2期89-92,共4页
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
基金
苏州图书馆学会课题(14-C-11).
关键词
文献计量学
指标
论文
评价
Bibliometrics
Index
Paper
Evaluation
