摘要
历组卜辞是武乙、文丁卜辞的主体。自二十世纪七十年代以来,关于历组卜辞时代的争论进行了近四十年。争论中,我们于1980,1984年发表了《论武乙、文丁卜辞》与《再论武乙、文丁卜辞》两篇文章,论述该类卜辞是属于武乙、文丁时代。尤其是2011年发表的《三论武乙、文丁卜辞》一文,指出在历组卜辞中明确存在“小乙一三祖一父丁”这一祭祀顺序,这是小乙与父丁之间存有“三祖”先王的确证,小乙之后的父丁不是康丁,在学术界产生了较大影响。
In the oracle bones unearthed at the Yinxu Site, the oracle inscriptions of “No-name Group” and "Li Group" are identified by the names of the diviners. According to the traditional periodization, the oracle inscriptions of “No-name Group” were created in the reigns of Kings Kang Ding and Wu Yi, which were earlier;the oracle inscriptions of "Li Group" were created in the reigns of Kings Wu Yi and Wen Ding, which were later. Since 1977 9 Li Xueqin puts forward and gradually perfects his two-system hypothesis which suggests that the “Fu Ding (Father Ding)" mentioned in the oracle inscriptions of “Li Group” referred to King Wu Ding, and the "Fu Yi (Father Yi)” referred to King Xiao Yi;this hypothesis advances the creation date of the oracle inscriptions of "Li Group” to the later period of the reign of King Wu Ding and the reign of King Zu Geng, which triggered an intense dispute in the oracle bone studies field lasting for over 40 years. Soon after the presentation of the w two-system hypothesisLin Yun joined this dispute and also put forward another Mtwosystem hypothesis” which was almost the same as that of Li Xueqin: both suggest that the oracle inscriptions of "Li Group” should be dated to the later period of the reign of King Wu Ding and the reign of King Zu Geng, and the oracle inscriptions of "Li Group" were created earlier than that of "No-name Group";the inscriptions in "Li Group99 mentioning "Father Yi” were created in the later period of the reign of King Wu Ding, and that in the same group mentioning "Father Ding” were created in the reign of King Zu Geng. Their views were exactly against the traditional periodization conclusion. Which one is earlier and which one is later, the "Li Group" or the "No-name Group".This became the focus of the dispute. By script styles, this paper classifies the oracle inscriptions of "No-name Groupw into five types;according to the appellations in these inscriptions, this paper proves that the inscriptions of “No-name Group” were created in the
作者
曹定云
刘一曼
Cao Dingyun;Liu Yiman
出处
《考古学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第2期193-212,共20页
Acta Archaeologica Sinica
