摘要
目的探讨选择氟保护漆+窝沟封闭术对龋齿患儿进行干预后获得的预防效果。方法选择本院2014年8月至2016年5月收治的80例口腔科患儿作为实验对象;依据龋齿预防措施的不同进行分组;A1组(25例):选择窝沟封闭术方法进行预防干预;A2组(25例):选择氟保护漆方法进行预防干预;A3组(30例):选择氟保护漆+窝沟封闭术进行预防干预;最终就3组口腔科患儿治疗6个月、12个月以及24个月封闭剂脱落率以及龋齿发生率加以对比。结果完成治疗6个月,A1组部分脱落率0%,全部脱落率0%,A2组部分脱落率8%,全部脱落率0%,A3组部分脱落率0%,全部脱落率0%,治疗后12个月,A1组部分脱落率12%,全部脱落率0%,A2组部分脱落率16%,全部脱落率0%,A3组部分脱落率0%,全部脱落率0%,治疗后24个月,A1组部分脱落率20%,全部脱落率20%,A2组部分脱落率24%,全部脱落率16%,A3组部分脱落率7%,全部脱落率0%,完成治疗6个月以及12个月,在封闭剂脱落率方面,3组差异无统计学意义;治疗24个月,同A3组封闭剂脱落率对比,A1组以及A2组呈现出显著提升(P<0.05)。A1组,完成治疗6个月龋齿发生率0%,治疗后12个月为16%,治疗后24个月为52%;A2组,完成治疗6个月龋齿发生率0%,治疗后12个月为20%,治疗后24个月为52%;A3组,完成治疗6个月龋齿发生率0%,治疗后12个月为0%,治疗后24个月为3%;完成治疗6个月,所有患儿均未呈现出龋齿现象;治疗12个月,3组在龋齿发生率方面差异无统计学意义;治疗24个月,同A3组龋齿发生率对比,A1组以及A2组呈现出显著提升(P<0.05)。结论医疗人员对于口腔科患儿选择氟保护漆+窝沟封闭术进行干预,对于封闭剂脱落率以及龋齿发生率的降低可以做出充分保证,从而获得确切龋齿预防效果。
Objective To explore the preventive effect of fluoroprotective paint + furrow closure on children with dental caries after intervention.Methods 80 cases of oral cavity children admitted to our hospital from August 2014 to May 2016 were selected as subjects. Group according to the different preventive measures of dental caries. Group A1(25 cases): prevention and intervention were performed using the method of pit closure.Group A2(25 cases): fluorine-containing protective coatings were selected for preventive intervention. Group A3(30 cases): fluorine-containing protective paint + furrow closure was selected for preventive intervention. Finally, three groups of children in the department of stomatology were compared for 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. Results Complete treatment for 6 months, A1 group part of the loss rate of 0%, all fall off rate is 0%, A2 group part of the loss rate of 8%, all fall off rate is 0%, A3 group part of the loss rate of 0%, all fall off rate is 0%, 12 months after treatment,A1 group part of the loss rate of 12%, all fall off rate is 0%, A2 group part of the loss rate of 16%, all fall off rate is 0%, A3 group part of the loss rate of 0%, all fall off rate is 0%, 24 months after treatment, A1 group part of the loss rate of 20%, all fall off rate is 20%, A2 group part of the loss rate of 24%, all fall off rate is 16%, A3 group part of the loss rate of 7%, There was no significant difference in the rate of occlusion abscission between the three groups. After 24 months of treatment, compared with the occlusion rate of A3 group, the A1 group and A2 group showed a significant increase(P<0.05). In the A1 group, the incidence of dental caries was 0% at 6 months after completion of treatment, 16% at 12 months after treatment and52% at 24 months after treatment. In A2 group, the incidence of dental caries was 0% at 6 months after completion of treatment, 20% at 12 months after treatment and 52% at 24 months after treatment. In the A3 group, the incidence of dental caries was 0% at 6 months afte
作者
王珊
方莉
Wang Shan;Fang Li(Department of stomatology, First people' s Hospital of Fuzhou city, Fuzhou, Jiangxi, 344000, China)
出处
《当代医学》
2019年第14期87-89,共3页
Contemporary Medicine
关键词
龋齿
氟保护漆
窝沟封闭术
预防效果
Decayed teeth
Fluorine protective paint
Pit closure
Protective effect
