摘要
《申报》早期对司法案件的报道体现出媒体与司法机构的互动,有了舆论监督的雏形,也出现干预司法的不规范报道。"周小大案"、"徐壬癸案"、"杨月楼案"、"杨乃武案"是《申报》创刊初期的司法案件,该报对案件的报道打破了以往单一的信息传达模式,不仅提供丰富的信息,而且成为各方观点的互动平台,实现民意君意的上传下达;同时具有"把关纠偏"的意识,客观上营造了舆论空间,履行了媒体的舆论监督职能,是一种基于儒家文化的无意识自律。但由于报纸还处在探索阶段,从具体的报道操作来看,出现了"未判决先定罪"、"轻事实依据,重道德批判"等干预司法公正的苗头,这是现有研究中忽略探讨的部分。不过由于报刊刚起步,加上一些客观因素干扰,报道出现不规范实属正常,《申报》对案件的报道发挥的积极作用远超过不足。
The early court-cases reports in Shun Pao reflected the interaction between the media and judicial institutions, it’s the early stage of public opinion supervision, but there were also some nonstandard reports that intervened justice. "Zhou Xiaoda case","Xu Rengui case","Yang Yuelou case","Yang Naiwu case" were occurred at the beginning of Shun Pao’s foundation, reports of the four cases in Shun Pao broke the previous single mode of information transmission, not only provided a wealth of information, but also became an interactive platform for views exchanging between the authority and the civilians;Besides, Shun Pao played the role of the gatekeeper, it created public opinion space objectively and performed the media supervision function,which was a unconscious self-discipline of Confucian culture. However, since the newspaper was still in the stage of exploration, some reports showed a nascent intervention of justice, such as "newspaper convicted cases before final judgement"、"reports preferred moral criticism rather than judgement based on facts",which was ignored in previous studies.To be frankly, Shun Pao was a start-up newspaper at that moment, there were some inevitable objective factors, so these problems were easily forgiven, when it comes to these reports of Shun Pao, the positive influence is more than the negative ones.
作者
王润泽
赵萌
Wang Runze;Zhao Meng
出处
《新闻春秋》
2019年第2期61-74,共14页
Journalism Evolution
基金
国家社科重大项目"百年中国新闻史料整理与研究"(项目号15ZDB140)
关键词
《申报》
司法报道
舆论监督
干预司法
Shun Pao
Judicial reports
Supervision by public opinion
Intervene justice
