期刊文献+

果蔗品种的种植表现与综合评价 被引量:4

Filed Performance and Comprehensive Evaluation on Chewing Cane Varieties
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为筛选出适宜余杭地区气候、生态条件的果蔗良种,引进了潭州大白蔗、温联果蔗、温联2号、广东黄皮果蔗、温岭青皮果蔗5个品种,加上当地主栽品种临平紫皮果蔗和临平上河青(对照)共7个品种,从产量、口感、抗性等方面进行综合比较。结果表明,广东黄皮果蔗综合表现最好,可作为主栽品种推广;温联2号表现较优,可适度推广。临平上河青和临平紫皮果蔗虽然综合表现差,但品质表现最好,作为地方种质资源应加以保护利用。 The comparative test of five introduced chewing cane varieties (Dabaizhe, Wenlian, Wenlian2, Guangdong Huangpi and Wenling Qingpi) and two local main cultivars (Linping Zipi, Linping Shangheqing as control) for cane yield, taste, resistance were carried out so as to select suitable varieties for local climate and ecological conditions in Yuhang district. The results showed that Guangdong Huangpi performed comprehensively the best and could be popularized as the main cultivar, while Wenlian2 had much better comprehensive performance and could be moderately popularized. Although Linping Shangheqing and Linping Zipi had lower comprehensive performance, their quality performances were the best, which could be protected and utilized as local germplasm resources.
作者 庞法松 王玉坤 庞华强 楼玲 钱东 蔡斌军 Pang Fasong;Wang Yukun;Pang Huaqiang;Lou Ling;Qian Dong;Cai Binjun(Agricultural Technique Service Center of Hangzhou Yuhang District, Hangzhou 311100;Hangzhou Lü'an Ecological Agriculture Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 311100;Management Station of Agricultural Ecology & Plant Protection of Hangzhou Yuhang District, Hangzhou 311100)
出处 《中国糖料》 2019年第2期37-41,共5页 Sugar Crops of China
基金 浙江省现代种业发展专项(2015006)
关键词 果蔗品种 引种 品质 评价 chewing cane varieties introduction varieties quality evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献165

共引文献72

同被引文献44

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部