期刊文献+

TLIF与PLIF治疗老年退变性腰椎滑脱并椎管狭窄症对比 被引量:2

Comparison of TLIF and PLIF in the treatment of aged degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:总结经椎间孔椎体间融合术(TLIF)与经后路椎体间融合术(PLIF)治疗老年退变性腰椎滑脱并椎管狭窄症的临床疗效。方法:收集2016年3月-2018年3月我院收治的退变性腰椎滑脱并椎管狭窄症老年患者73例临床资料,随机分对照组36例执行PLIF治疗,分析组37例予以TLIF治疗,比较两组手术情况、椎间融合优良率。结果:分析组椎间融合优良率94.59%明显高于对照组63.89%(P <0.05);分析组手术时间明显短于对照组,且术中出血量、术后引流量明显少于对照组(P <0.05)。结论:相较于经后路椎体间融合术,经椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗老年退变性腰椎滑脱并椎管狭窄症疗效更优,值得临床推广应用。 Objective: To summarize the clinical effects of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterior interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis in the elderly. Methods: Clinical data of 73 elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis treated in our hospital from March 2016 to March 2018 were collected and randomly assigned to 36 patients in the control group for PLIF and 37 patients in the analysis group were treated with TLIF. The operation conditions of the two groups and the excellent rate of interbody fusion were compared. Results: The excellent rate of interbody fusion was 94.59% in the analysis group, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (63.89%)(P<0.05). The operation time of the analysis group was significantly shorter than that of the control group, and the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage of the analysis group were significantly less than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with posterior lumbar interbody fusion, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion was superior for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. It was worthy of clinical application.
作者 高雪伟 陈旺 朱凌 Gao Xuewei;Chen Wang;Zhu Ling
出处 《中医临床研究》 2019年第3期115-117,共3页 Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
关键词 经椎间孔椎体间融合术 退变性腰椎滑脱 Transforaminal interbody fusion Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献46

  • 1姜传杰,杨永军,谭远超,周纪平,姚树强,杨凯.侧凸宽/长比值在短节段矫形固定治疗退变性腰椎侧凸并腰椎管狭窄症中的应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2013,21(23):2424-2427. 被引量:1
  • 2何育风,雷龙鸣.推拿抱滚结合功能锻炼治疗腰椎滑脱症118例[J].广西中医学院学报,2005,8(1):22-23. 被引量:6
  • 3陈之白,周良安,王义生,詹世强.腰椎滑脱症的回顾与治疗新进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(3):167-169. 被引量:36
  • 4朱立国,于杰,高景华,李金学,王尚全,罗杰,杨克新,张清,王海军,张威,赵国东.中医正骨推拿手法治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的临床研究[J].北京中医,2006,25(10):579-582. 被引量:29
  • 5Radcliff KE, Rihn JM, Hilibrand AM, et al. Does the Duration of Symptoms in Patients With Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Spon- dylolisthesis Affect Outcomes?: Analysis of the Spine Outcomes Research Trial [J]. Spine, 2011, 36(9):207-210. 被引量:1
  • 6Wu H, Yu WD, Jiang R, et al. Treatment of multilevel degenera- tive lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis using a combina- tion of microendoscopic discectomy and minimally invasive transfo- raminal lumbar interbody fusion [J]. Exp Ther Med., 2013, 15(2): 567-571. 被引量:1
  • 7Choi Ws, Oh CH, Ji GY, et al. Spinal canal morphology and clini- cal outcomes of microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilat- eral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis [J]. Eur Spine J, 2013, 13(4):623-628. 被引量:1
  • 8Sasaki K,Senda M, Katayama Y, et al. Characteristics of Postural Sway during Quiet Standing Before and After the Occurrence of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication in Female Patients with De- generative Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2013, 17(6):675-678. 被引量:1
  • 9Lee YB, Patel AA. Lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spon- dylolisthesis [J]. Semin Spine Surg, 2013, 10(4):256-262. 被引量:1
  • 10Annette K, Werner S, Erich K. In vitro stabilizing effect of a trans- foraminal compared with two posterior lumbar interbody fusion cas- es [J]. Spine,2005,22(30):E665-E670. 被引量:1

共引文献75

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部