摘要
巴赫金提出复调小说理论以来,中外文论界一直存在着不同意见的争论。而导致这一问题争论不休的关键点,就在于巴赫金在"外位性"这一重要理论的原论述上,存在着一定的理论缺失,从而也导致后人对这一理论的后理解上也存在着一定的误解。所以,从巴赫金先后发出的两种不同声音入手,可以提出巴赫金的外位性理论实际存在着一直被人忽视、理应从中揭示出的外位性的"双重含义"问题。只有厘清这一重要问题,才会使我们采用新的眼光,对这一外来文论的是非得失做出进一步实事求是的判断,从而更加深入、合理、完整地把握巴赫金的复调小说理论和外位性理论的实际内涵与意义。同样需要反思的一个问题是:我们在中外文论的交流中,不应该仅仅扮演一个接受者、被影响者甚至是失语者的角色,而是应该变被动为主动,形成独立自主的审美判断力,不断建构中外文论交流中的互动关系,这也是中国文论话语建构中应当树立的一种品格。
Since Bakhtin proposed polyphonic theory,it has been controversial in the field of literary theory at home and abroad.The unresolved issue is a difficulty in Bakhtin studies and also a fundamental question directly related to the validity of Bakhtin’spolyphonic theory.The key point to the debate lies in the certain theoretical shortcomings of Bakhtin’s original discussion on"externality,"which in turn leads to later generations’ misunderstandings.Therefore,starting from the two different voices by Bakhtin,it can be suggested that Bakhtin’s theory of externality actually has a"two-fold meaning"that would reveal the externality neglected.It is by clarifying this important issue that can we retain a new perspective and re-understand the so-called"contradiction"of his two different voices from relative internal and external perspectives to profoundly,rationally and completely grasp the actual implication and meaning of his polyphonic theory and externality theory.In addition,it also reminds us that in the exchanges of Chinese and Western literary theories,we should take initiative to form an independent aesthetic judgment rather than being a recipient or sufferer of aphasia.This should be established in the construction of Chinese literary discourse.
出处
《中国文学批评》
CSSCI
2019年第1期86-97,159,共13页
Chinese Journal of Literary Criticism
