期刊文献+

我国概率地震区划图的检验 被引量:1

Test of PSHA maps of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从概率地震区划图是否可以检验的讨论切入,阐述了检验概率区划图的思路。收集、整理区划图颁布以后发生的5级以上(含)地震的等震线数据,在GIS平台上建立了投影方式、投影参数、比例尺一致的地震区划图和等震线信息系统。对等震线不完全、没有等震线数据的地震,借助GIS空间操作的功能、据地震动衰减关系推算,生成、完善相应的等震线。将各个地震的等震线图逐一叠加在区划图上,留大舍小,生成最大烈度差图层。统计出各正烈度差的分布范围,低估、严重低估的总面积及相应的百分比。据此,建议了区划方法改进的研究重点。 Starting from the argument if seismic zoning map compiled by probabilistic procedure could be tested,a way to test probabilistic zoning map is presented in this paper. The isoseismals of earthquakes with magnitude no less than 5 occurred after the map issued are collected,and then an information system of seismic zoning map and isoseismals is built on GIS platform with the same projection manner and same parameters. For those quakes without or with just incomplete isoseismal data,the isoseismials are generated or completed by regional attenuation relationship and the spatial manipulation functions of GIS. The isoseismals are overlaid on the zoning map one by one,and the largest Intensity difference is kept for each area,finally a maximum Intensity difference map is worked out. The areas with positive Intensity difference are marked. The total areas with underestimation and badly underestimation on the zoning map are counted up and percentages of them to the corresponding total areas on China main land are analyzed. The main point for improvement of the zoning is suggested from the test.
作者 王立媛 陶夏新 陶正如 姜伟 WANG Liyuan;TAO Xiaxin;TAO Zhengru;JIANG Wei(Key Laboratery of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics,China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080,China;Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090,China)
出处 《地震工程与工程振动》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期28-33,共6页 Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics
基金 中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(2017B12) 中国国家自然科学基金项目(51778151,51311120080,51778197) 中国国家国际科技合作项目(2011DFA21460) 俄罗斯基础研究科学基金项目(RFBR13-05-91167).
关键词 地震区划图 等震线 检验 GIS seismic zoning map isoseisms test GIS
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献14

  • 1廖振鹏,李大华,孙平善.中国地震烈度衰减的概率模型[J]地震学报,1988(02). 被引量:1
  • 2Bommer Julian J, Norman A Ahrahamson. Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic hazard Analyses often Lead to Increased ttazard Estimates[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2006,96(6) : 1967-1977. 被引量:1
  • 3Stein S, R Celler, M l.iu. Bad Assumptions or Bad Luck: Why Earthquake Hazard Maps Need Objective Testing[J].Seismo- logical Research I.etters,2011,82(5) :623-626. 被引量:1
  • 4Slein S,R Celler,M Liu. Why Earthquake Hazard Maps often Fail and What to Do About it[J].Tectonophysics,2011,562- 563;1 25. 被引量:1
  • 5Wang Z,James C Cohh .A Critique of Probabilistic Versus De terministic Seismic Hazard Analysis with Special Reference to the New Madrid Seismic Zone[J].Geological Society of Ameri- ca (Speclal Papers ) ,2013,493,259-275. 被引量:1
  • 6Kossobokov V G,A K Nekrasova.Global Seismic Hazard As- sessment Program Maps Are Erroneous [J].Seismic Instru ments,2012,48(2):162 -170. 被引量:1
  • 7Wyss M,A Nekrasova,V Kossobokov.Errors in Expected Hu man Losses Due to Incorrect Seismic Hazard Estimaies[J]. Natural Hazard,2012,62(3):927- 935. 被引量:1
  • 8李善邦.中国地震区域划分圃及其说明[J].地球物理学报,1957,6(2):2-158. 被引量:1
  • 9国家地震局.中国地震烈度区划(1990)概论[M].北京:地震出版社,1993. 被引量:1
  • 10中国地震年鉴编辑委员会.中国地震年鉴(1949-1981)[M]中国地震年鉴1982-2007[M].北京:地震出版社,19901983,1985,1985,1986,1987,1988,1990,199l,1992,19921993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,1999,200l,20022003,2004,2005,2007,2008,2009. 被引量:1

共引文献13

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部