期刊文献+

中美战略竞争管控的制度主义分析 被引量:2

Managing the Strategic Competition between China and the United States: An Institutional Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从制度主义的视角看,创设包容双方在内的地区政治安全制度是中美两国超越"修昔底德陷阱"的理性选择。在政治与国际关系领域,制度常常基于问题而创设,问题相关性、利益相容度、议题紧密度、关键节点和制度共识决定了相关国家能否就某个问题创设出政治安全制度。在东亚地区,朝核问题是中美两国在东亚地区创设共同政治安全制度的重要机会。当前,解决朝核问题面临新的机遇,中美两国可从管控中美战略竞争的大局出发,始终视朝鲜半岛无核化为首要战略利益,始终视对方为解决朝核问题的战略伙伴,并通过战略妥协确立朝鲜半岛和平共处的制度框架,从而为缓和与管控中美在整个东亚地区乃至全球范围的战略竞争提供良好的开端与切入点。 Institutionalism could serve as a rational approach for China and the United States to escape Thucydides's Trap by creating a set of inclusive regional political and security arrangement to accommodate difference and disputes.In international politics,institutions are usually constructed to address specific problems issues.Whether or not the institutions could be constructed is determined by five key factors,namely,relevance of the issue to be dealt with,compatibility of the interests involved,interdependency of the issues concerned,the key developments,and consensus on possible institutions.In East Asia,North Korea nuclear issue is the right case to test this approach.Almost all countries concerned,especially China and the United States,are very much frustrated by the development in the Korean Peninsula in the past two decades,even though many believe stability,denuclearization,and diplomatic solution are the shared interests.Now there exists a rare historical opportunity in the Korean Peninsula to construct the institution to address this challenge and accommodate conflicting interests.Both China and the United States should try to manage their differences and disputes,considering the other side as partner for the shared goal of denuclearization,taking the other side's legitimate concerns into consideration,and managing to make concessions for a long lasting regional security arrangement.If a new security institution could be put into place successfully in the Korean Peninsula,then it will be possible for China and the United States to manage their competition in other region and areas as well.
作者 李开盛 LI Kaisheng(Institute of International Relations,Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences)
出处 《当代美国评论》 2018年第4期1-20,119,120,共22页 Contemporary American Review
关键词 中美关系 战略竞争 朝核问题 制度主义 Sino-U.S.Relationship Strategic Competition North Korea Nuclear Issue Institutionalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

  • 1陆伯斌,李真.和平地理学:21世纪的东亚[J].世界经济与政治,2000(11):69-74. 被引量:23
  • 2.Lee Myung-Bak s Victory:Political Configuration in Korea and Korea-U.S.Re Cations[].Pacific Forum.2008 被引量:1
  • 3.Seoul and Beijing Planning for Reforms in Economic Relations[].Joong Ang Daily.2008 被引量:1
  • 4Kim Heung-kyu."China Policy of the New Administration:Security and Diplomacy"[].Korea Focus.2008 被引量:1
  • 5记者 赵成.习近平会见金正恩特使崔龙海[N].人民日报.2013(001) 被引量:1
  • 6Jim Garamone."Gates:North Korea Becoming Direct Threat to U S."[].Jan.112011 被引量:1
  • 7Transcript:President Obama’’s Exclusive Interview withGeorge Stephanopoulos. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/03/transcript-president-obamas-interview-with-george-stephanopoulos . 2013 被引量:1
  • 8Glenn Kessler."North Korea Tests U.S.Policy of’’Strategic Patience’’"[].The Washington Post.2010 被引量:1
  • 9Hillary Clinton.'Remarks at the Asia Socie-ty'. http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/02 /117333.htm . 2009 被引量:1
  • 10Hillary Clinton.'Remarks at the United States Institute of Peace'. http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/10/130806.htm . 2009 被引量:1

共引文献69

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部