摘要
从三个理论角度分析最高人民法院发布的十大经济行政典型案例。第一,政府控制市场准入的方式和程度各不相同,应当避免出现政府在维护市场秩序的同时,侵害市场主体的自由竞争权;第二,应当在政府干预经济与市场自我调节之间廓清界限,即经济行政权在何时及何种程度上才能最佳行使,避免过度干预市场的同时也避免出现经济行政不作为现象;第三,该系列案例在一定程度上有助于指导行政协议的订立、履行以及行政协议纠纷解决方式多元化的实现。
This paper analyzes the ten typical economic administrative cases published by the Supreme People’s Court from the following three theoretical perspectives.First,the way and the extent of government control of market access varies,therefore,the government,while upholding the market order,should avoid violating the market entities’freedom and right of competition.Second,the boundary between the government intervention in economy and market self-regulation should be clarified.That is,when and to what extent the economic executive power is at the best practice,avoiding at the same time excessive intervention in the market and economic administrative nonfeasance.Third,the series of cases guide the implementation of the administrative agreement to a certain extent,and the diversification of the solution to the administrative agreement disputes.
作者
胡锦璐
Hu Jinlu(Law school,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai,201620,China)
出处
《山东理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2019年第1期36-40,共5页
Journal of Shandong University of Technology（Social Sciences Edition）
基金
上海市哲学社会科学规划项目"中国特色社会主义法治的形成与发展研究"(2017BHC012)
关键词
经济行政
市场准入
经济行政权
行政协议
economic administration
admission to market
economic executive power
administrative agreement
