期刊文献+

替吉奥与卡培他滨分别联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期结直肠癌临床疗效比较 被引量:25

Comparative Analysis Gio and Capecitabine were Combined with Therapy Clinical Efficacy of Oxaliplatin the Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比分析替吉奥(TGOPC,S-1)与卡培他滨(Xeloda)分别联合奥沙利铂(Oxaliplatin,L-OHP)治疗晚期结直肠癌(colorectal cancer,CRC)的临床疗效。方法随机选取接受治疗晚期结肠癌患者150例,采用S-1联合L-OHP治疗方案75例,即为A组;75例采用Xeloda联合L-OHP治疗方案,即为B组。两组每治疗3个周期后对疗效和毒性进行评价对比分析。结果 A、B两组患者一般资料对比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A、B两组ORR和DCR对比分析,差异均无统计学意义(P=0.825,P=0.698)。A组患者4例失去联系,B组患者2例失去联系,中位随访时间为12个月。A组和B组中位疾病进展时间分别为8.8个月和8.2个月,A、B两组对比,差异无统计学意义(χ~2=2.741,P=0.124)。A、B两组大多不良反应出现在Ⅰ和Ⅱ阶段,Ⅲ和Ⅳ阶段出现较少,但都没有出现严重不良反应而停止服药的,且没有在治疗期间出现死亡病例。A组有2例患者表现为Ⅳ度血小板减少,通过减少服用S-1药量后完成化疗;B组有4例患者表现Ⅲ度手足综合症,也是通过减少Xeloda药量后完成化疗,两组其他患者都可以耐受。骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应、肝功能异常、手足综合征和口腔黏膜炎为A和B两组主要共有的不良反应,在两组对比中,A组的血小板减少发生率比B组的高,差异有统计学意义(P=0.042);A组的手足综合症发生率比B组的低,差异有统计学意义(P=0.031)。结论 A组和B组的治疗方案疗效相近;S-1联合L-OHP治疗晚期CRC患者确切有效,值得推广。 Objective Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of Tegrio(TGOPC,S-1)and Capecitabine(Xeloda)combined with Oxaliplatin(L-OHP)in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer(CRC). Methods One hundred and fifty patients with advanced colon cancer were randomly selected.Seventy-five patients were treated with S-1 combined with L-OHP,ie,group A;75 patients were treated with Xeloda combined with L-OHP,ie group B.The efficacy and toxicity of each group after 3 cycles of treatment were evaluated and compared. Results There was no significant difference in the general data between A and B groups( P >0.05).There was no significant difference in ORR and DCR between group A and B( P =0.825, P =0.698).In group A,4 patients lost contact,2 patients in group B lost contact,and the median follow-up time was 12 months.The median time to disease progression of group A and group B was 8.8 months and 8.2 months respectively.There was no significant difference between groups A and B(χ 2=2.741, P =0.124).Most of the adverse reactions against groups A and B appeared in stages Ⅰ and Ⅱ.There were fewer stages Ⅲ and Ⅳ,but no severe adverse reactions occurred and they stopped taking the drug.There were no deaths during the treatment period.In group A,2 patients presented with grade Ⅳ thrombocytopenia and completed chemotherapy by reducing the dose of S-1;in group B,4 patients showed grade Ⅲ hand-foot syndrome,and chemotherapy was also completed by reducing the Xeloda dose.Other patients can tolerate.Myelosuppression,gastrointestinal reactions,abnormal liver function,hand-foot syndrome,and oral mucositis were the main common adverse reactions in the A and B groups.In the two groups,the incidence of thrombocytopenia was higher in group A than in group B.The difference was statistically significant( P =0.042).The incidence of hand-foot syndrome in group A was lower than that in group B.The difference was statistically significant( P =0.031). Conclusion Regimen groups A and B of similar efficacy;S-1 L-OHP combined treatment of p
作者 何丽琳 沈永祥 HE Lilin;SHEN Yongxiang(Tianmen First People's Hospital of Hubei province,Tianmen,431700)
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2019年第1期128-131,共4页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 替吉奥 卡培他滨 奥沙利铂 晚期结直肠癌 For Gio Capecitabine Oxaliplatin Advanced colorectal cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1卢红文,杭晓声.卡培他滨联合长春瑞宾治疗晚期乳腺癌[J].中国药师,2006,9(9):842-844. 被引量:3
  • 2Toussaint, IZZO, Spielmann M. Plase I - II trail of continuous infusion vinorelbine for advanced breast cancer [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 1994,12( 1 ) :2102 - 2112. 被引量:1
  • 3Isabelle Raycoquard, Pierre Biron, Thomas Bachel, et al. Vinorelbine and cisplatin ( CIVIC Regimen) for the treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma after failure of anthracy cline and/or paclitaxel - containing regimens[ J]. Cancer, 1998,82( 1 ) : 134 - 140. 被引量:1
  • 4Van minekwitz G. Capecitabine(Xeloda) combined with vinorelbine in treatment for advanced patients with metastatic breast cancer [ J]. Eur J Cancer,2003,1 ( suppl 5 ) :S114. 被引量:1
  • 5Saltz LB,Clarke S,Diaz-Rubio E,et al.Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer:a randomized phase I11 study[J].J Clin Onc01,2008;26:2013-2039. 被引量:1
  • 6Tanaka F, Fukuse T, Wada H,et al.The history,mechanism and clinical use of oral 5-fluorouracil derivative chemotherapeutic angents[J].Ctirr Pharm Biotechnol,2000;l(2): 137- 164. 被引量:1
  • 7Terashima M,Fujiwara H,Takagane A,et al.Prediction of sensitivity to fluoropyrimidines by metabolic and target enzyme activities in gastric cancer[J]. Gastric Cancer,2003;6(Suppl 1):71-81. 被引量:1
  • 8Yoshisue K,Masuda H,Matsushima E,et aI.Tissue distribution and biotransformation of potassium oxonate after oral administration of a novel anfitumor agent(drug combination of tegafur,5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine,and potassium oxonate) to rats[J].Drug Metab Dipos,2000;28(10): 1162-1167. 被引量:1
  • 9Sato A,Ito T, Tomita T, et al.Chemotherapy of gastric cancer-a review of clinical trial in Japan[J].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho,2002;29(9): 1522-1531. 被引量:1
  • 10Yong Mi Seol.Arol fluoropyrimdines(capecibatine or S-l) and eisplatin as first line treatment in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer:a retrospective study [J].JPN J Clin OncoI,2009;39(1):43-48. 被引量:1

共引文献27

同被引文献193

引证文献25

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部