期刊文献+

两种化疗方案对转移性结肠癌患者近期疗效、NLR、PLR指标及毒副作用的影响 被引量:13

Effects of Two Chemotherapy Regimens on Short-term Efficacy,NLR,PLR and Toxic and Side Effect in Patients with Metastatic Colon Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究FOLFOX4与XELOX化疗方案治疗转移性结肠癌的临床效果。方法回顾性分析162例转移性结肠癌患者临床资料,根据化疗方案不同分为F组(n=81)与X组(n=81)。F组患者采用FOLFOX4方案治疗,X组患者则应用XELOX方案进行治疗。比较治疗前及治疗4周期后两组患者细胞学指标、血清肿瘤标志物水平变化,分析治疗4周期后两组患者治疗效果、生活质量及4周期内严重毒副反应发生情况差异。结果治疗4周期后,两组NLR、PLR、RDW、CA19-9、CCSA-2、OPN水平均较治疗前有显著下降,且X组明显低于同期F组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);两组死亡率比较无统计学意义(P>0.05);X组ORR明显高于F组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);X组EORTC-QLQ-CR38功能、症状维度及总分均明显高于F组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。严重白细胞减少、口腔黏膜炎、手足综合征及神经毒性发生率均明显低于F组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论两种化疗方案均能改善转移性结肠癌患者NLR、PLR指标,其中XELOX方案近期疗效更为理想,且毒副作用发生率更低,有利于患者预后恢复。 Objective To explore the clinical effects of FOLFOX4 and XELOX chemotherapy regimens on metastatic colon carcinoma.Methods 162 patients with metastatic colon carcinoma were selected for this study and divided into X group(n=81)and F group(n=81)by the random number table method.F group were treated with the FOLFOX4 regimen,and X group were treated with the XELOX regimen.The levels of cytological indexes[neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio(NLR),platelet/lymphocyte count ratio(PLR),red cell distribution width(RDW)]and serum tumor markers[carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9),colorectal cancer specific antigen-2(CCSA-2),osteopontin(OPN)]were compared before treatment and after 4 cycles of treatment.And the treatment effects[1.1 version of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors(RECIST1.1)]and quality of life[38 items of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life-colorectal cancer(EORTC-QLQ-CR38)]after 4 cycles of treatment and the occurrence of severe toxic and side effect within 4 cycles[National Cancer Institute-3.0 Version of Conventional Toxicity Criteria(NCI-CTC 3.0)]were analyzed.Results After 4 cycles of treatment,the levels of NLR,PLR,RDW,CA19-9,CCSA-2 and OPN in the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment,and the levels in X group were significantly lower than those in F group(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups(P>0.05).The ORR in X group was significantly higher than that in F group(P<0.05).The scores of function and symptom dimensions and the total score of EORTC-QLQ-CR38 in X group were significantly higher than those in F group(all P<0.05).During 4 cycles of treatment,the incidence rates of severe leukopenia,oral mucositis,hand-foot syndrome and neurotoxicity were significantly higher than those in F group(P<0.05).Conclusion Two chemotherapy regimens can improve the NLR and PLR indexes of patients with metastatic colon carcinoma,the XELOX regimen can have more ideal short-term efficacy,and low incidence
作者 徐琳 XU Lin(Department of Oncology,Suining Central Hospital,Suining 629000,China)
出处 《标记免疫分析与临床》 CAS 2018年第12期1895-1899,共5页 Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine
关键词 FOLFOX4 XELOX 结肠癌 近期疗效 毒副作用 FOLFOX4 XELOX Colon carcinoma Short-term efficacy Toxic and side effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献182

  • 1黄彩云,韩素桂,张景华,杨颖,胡文俭,周秀艳,赵洪焕,刘启为,刘洪梅,马龙滨,徐康,李颖.甲胎蛋白异质体/甲胎蛋白检测联合CT扫描在原发性肝癌诊断中的价值[J].肿瘤防治研究,2014,41(2):163-165. 被引量:10
  • 2徐晓,陈卫昌,林茂松,张宝峰,方静,周琼,胡莺,郜恒骏.β-catenin/c-myc在结肠癌组织中的表达及其临床意义[J].中国现代医药杂志,2007,9(1):1-4. 被引量:6
  • 3De Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, et al. Leucovorin and Fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer [J].J Clin Oncol, 2000,18 (16) : 2938-2947. 被引量:1
  • 4Sanoff H K, Sargent D J, Campbell M Data and Prognostic Factor Analysis Irinotecan Combinations for Advanced N9741 [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008,26(35) E, et al. Five-Year of Oxaliplatin and Colorectal Cancer: 5721-5727. 被引量:1
  • 5Cheeseman S L, Joel S P, Chester J D, et al. A "modified de Gramont" regimen of fluorouracil, alone and with oxaliplatin, for advanced colorectal cancer [ J ]. Br J Cancer, 2002,87 (4) : 393-399. 被引量:1
  • 6Grothey A, Sargent D. Overall survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer correlates with availability of fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin regardless of whether doublet or single-agent therapy is used first line [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23 (36) : 9441-9442. 被引量:1
  • 7Novello S, Bruzzi P, Barone C. Phase 111 study in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with two courses of cisplatin/gemcitabine followed by a randomization to three additional courses of the same combination or gemcitabine alone. Ann Oncol [J]. 2007,18(5) :903-908. 被引量:1
  • 8Maindrault-Goebel F, Lledo G, Chibaudel B, et al. Finalresuhs of OPTIMOX2, a large randomized phase ]I study of maintenance therapy or chemotherapy-free intervals (CFI) after FOLFOX in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MRC): A GERCOR study [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition), 2007,25(18S) :4013. 被引量:1
  • 9Chibaudel B, Maindrauh-Goebel F, Lledo G, et al. Can chemotherapy be discontinued in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 Study [J].J Clin Oncol, 2009,27 (34) : 5727-5733. 被引量:1
  • 10Tournigand C, Samson B, Scheithauer W, et al. Bevacizumab (Bey) with or without erlotinib as maintenance therapy, following induction first-line chemotherapy plus Bey, in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) : Efficacy and safety results of the International GERCORDREAM phase 111 trial [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition), 2012,30 (18S) : LBA3500. 被引量:1

共引文献328

同被引文献118

引证文献13

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部