摘要
我国新闻出版纠纷案件数量日益增多,在诉讼中不仅需要注意证明责任分配问题,举证时限对于裁判结果也可能产生较大的影响。现行民事诉讼法和相关司法解释规定了举证时限制度,对于促进新闻出版纠纷案件当事人举证、提高诉讼效率有着极大的意义,同时多元化的逾期举证后果又保证了实体公正和程序公正。然而,我国民事诉讼法中相关配套制度有所欠缺,可能会影响举证时限制度的功能发挥,应当对集中审理、审前准备、法官释明等制度进行完善。
Nowadays,the number of press and publication dispute is increasing.Not only the burden of proof but also time limit of proof will make difference.Article 65 of the revised Civil Procedure Code in 2012 added a new degree of proof,which is of great significance for promoting the evidence of the parties and improving the efficiency of litigation.At the same time,the diversified overdue evidence guarantees substantive justice and procedural fairness.However,the relevant supporting system in China's civil procedure law is lacking,which may affect the function of the limit when the evidence is issued.It should improve the system of centralized trial,pre-trial preparation,and interpretation of judges.
作者
王奕超
WANG Yichao(Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处
《北京印刷学院学报》
2018年第11期23-28,共6页
Journal of Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication
关键词
新闻出版纠纷
举证时限
证据失权
诉讼效率
press and publication dispute
time limit of proof
the invalidation of evidence
procedure efficiency
