摘要
从认知视角研究CDA已成为热点之一,宏观上有van Dijk的社会认知模式,微观上有Hart的策略理论。从van Dijk的模式中可发现,《纽约时报》对"一带一路"的报道凸显出中国的消极他者影响,体现了其意识形态;Hart从EP和CLA视角对《纽约时报》所报道的"一带一路"的语篇进行微观分析,发现其意识形态操控隐性地体现在话语策略中。《纽约时报》主要借力指称策略、述谓策略和框架化策略,制造各种有关中国的带有威胁性的消极影响的言论,以阻碍"一带一路"的国际传播。对实现意识形态的话语策略的微观解读进一步验证了批评话语分析与认知语言学融合的可能性。
From the perspective of cognition,the study of CDA has become one of the hotspots.On the macro level,there is van Dijk’s social cognition model,and on the micro level,there is Hart’s strategy theory.According to the model of van Dijk,the New York Times’coverage of the“One Belt and One Road”highlights the negative influence of China and its ideology.According to the research of Hart from the perspective of EP and CLA.,this paper makes a microscopic analysis of New York Times’reporting on“one Belt and one Road”and finds that the manipulation of ideology is implicit in the discourse strategies,which mainly include reference strategies,predication strategies and framing strategies.The New York Times’mainly relies on alleged strategies,narration strategies,and framework strategies to create a variety of statements about China’s threatening negative effects,hindering the international spread of the“One Belt and One Road”initiative.The microscopic interpretation of the discourse strategy of achieving ideology further verifies the possibility of the integration of critical discourse analysis and cognitive linguistics.
作者
陈钦
林丽珍
Chen Qin;Lin Lizhen(Zhicheng College Fuzhou University,Fuzhou Fujian 350007,China)
出处
《北京化工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2018年第4期67-74,共8页
Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
2016年福建省社会科学规划项目青年项目"基于隐喻架构的中美媒体‘一带一路’报道对比与中国话语权构建"研究(FJ2016C152)
关键词
话语策略
CDA
“一带一路”
discourse strategy
CDA (Critical Discourse Analysis)
“One Belt and One Road”
