期刊文献+

临床实践指南制订方法——经济学证据在指南制订中的应用 被引量:9

Methodology for clinical practice guidelines——economic evaluation evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 临床实践指南是缩小当前最佳证据与临床实践之间差距的决策工具,卫生经济学分析通过对卫生投入和健康结果进行比较,使有限的卫生资源得到合理配置和有效利用,是指南制订中考虑的因素之一。随着医疗成本骤增,指南制订时考虑医疗资源成本消耗问题受到越来越多的关注。本研究就将对指南制订中纳入经济学证据的原理和方法进行简单概述,以供我国临床实践指南制订者参考。 Clinical practice guidelines are decision-making tools that narrow the gap between current best evidence and clinical practice.Health economics analysis allows for the rational allocation and effective use of limited health resources by comparing health inputs with health outcomes,which is one of the factors,considered in the development of clinical practice guidelines.With the sudden increase in medical costs,the issue of considering the cost of medical resources in the development of guidelines has received increasing attention.This study will provide a brief overview of the principles and methods for incorporating economic evidence into the development of guidelines for reference in our clinical practice guidelines.
作者 桂裕亮 杨亮 曾宪涛 王云云 黄笛 靳英辉 王行环 Gui Yuliang;Yang Liang;Zeng Xiantao;Wang Yunyun;Huang Di;Jin Yinghui;Wang Xinghuan(Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University;Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine,Wuhan University;Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology,Wuhan 430071)
出处 《中国循证心血管医学杂志》 2018年第11期1285-1288,共4页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine
基金 国家重点研发计划专项基金(2016YFC0106300) 湖北省卫生和计划生育委员会联合基金项目(WJ2018H0009) 国家卫生计生委委托课题(医管办函[2018]9号)
关键词 指南 手册 卫生经济学证据 Guideline Handbook Economic evaluation evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献93

  • 1李海涛,李士雪,夏慧,李士保.药物经济学评价在国际卫生决策领域的应用现状、问题与对策[J].中国卫生经济,2006,25(9):75-78. 被引量:9
  • 2Goodman C S. Introduction to health technology assessement [R]. 2004. 被引量:1
  • 3Briggs A K, Claxton M. Sculpher, Descision Modelling for health economic evaluation[ R]. Oxford University Press, 2006. 被引量:1
  • 4GARY A M, Clarke P M, Wolstenholme J L. Applied Meth- ods of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Health Care [ M ]. Ox- ford University Press, 2011. 被引量:1
  • 5Kerr D. NHS White Paper: a NICE idea[J]. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 1998, 32( 1 ) : 5. 被引量:1
  • 6Hernandez-Villafuerte K, Garan M, Devlin N. Do nice deci- sions affect decisions in other countries? [ J ]. Value in Health, 2014, 17(7) : A418. 被引量:1
  • 7Cerri K H, Knapp M, Fernandez J L Decision making by NICE: examining the influences of evidence, process and context [ J ] Health Economics Policy and Law, 2014, 9(2): 119-141. 被引量:1
  • 8NICE. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal[R]. 2013. 被引量:1
  • 9NICE. Guide to the Multiple Technology Appraisal Process (reference N2022)[ RI. NICE guideline, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 10NICE. Guide to the Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process[ R]. 2012. 被引量:1

共引文献78

同被引文献178

引证文献9

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部