摘要
目的观察内窥冲洗引流管用于急性脓胸患者的疗效。方法选取53例急性脓胸患者纳入研究,随机分为研究组及对照组,研究组采用内窥冲洗引流管治疗,对照组采用普通引流管引流治疗。比较2组患者在不同时点的体温、抗生素使用率、引流管带管时间、血白细胞变化、脓肿转移例数等指标。结果 2组患者一般情况差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05),研究组的体温、血白细胞计数、抗生素使用时间、引流管带管时间、脓肿转移例数均显著少于对照组(P <0. 05)。结论与普通引流管相比,内窥冲洗引流管对脓胸患者的治疗效果更确切。
Objective To observe the curative effect of endoscopic irrigation drainage tube in patients with acute empyema.Methods A total of 53 patients with acute empyema were randomly divided into study group and control group.The control group was treated with drainage tube,while the study group was treated with endoscopic irrigation drainage tube.The body temperature,antibiotic use rate,indwelling time of drainage tube,leukocyte change and abscess metastasis cases were compared between the two groups at different time points.Results There was no significant difference in general data between the two groups(P>0.05).The study group had significantly lower body temperature and white blood cell count,shorter antibiotic use days,indwelling time of drainage tube time,and less abscess metastasis case than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with common drainage tube,endoscope irrigation drainage tube is more effective in treating patients with empyema.
作者
周杰
胡方勇
李鹏飞
ZHOU Jie;HU Fangyong;LI Pengfei(Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,Shuyang County People′s Hospital,Shuyang,Jiangsu,223600;Emergency Department,Jiangsu General Armed Police Hospital,Yangzhou,Jiangsu,225002)
出处
《实用临床医药杂志》
CAS
2018年第24期72-74,共3页
Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词
脓胸
内窥镜
冲洗引流管
empyema
endoscope
flushing drainage tube
