期刊文献+

协调前后共同结构规范对比与实船计算分析

Comparison of common structure criterion coordination from beginning to end and real ship calculation analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 就屈服强度直接计算的相关部分对比协调前后的共同结构规范,提供规范协调背景,探讨修改原因。指出协调后的规范更加合理和完善,在直接计算方面要求提高,船体结构也将更为保守。按协调后的规范要求,使用中国船级社(CCS)的新软件进行实船计算对比,验证了对规范的理论分析,并就应对新规范给出建议。 Comparing the relevant parts of the yield strength direct calculation with the common structural criterion coordination from beginning to end,the paper provides the background of criterion coordination and explores the reasons for modification. It is pointed out that the coordinated criterion is more reasonable and perfect,the requirements for direct calculation are improved,and the hull structure will be more conservative. According to the requirements of the coordinated criterion,the new software of China Classification Society( CCS) is used to carry out real ship calculation and comparison,which verifies the theoretical analysis of the criterion and gives suggestions on how to deal with the new criterion.
作者 褚洪 唐梓乔
出处 《江苏船舶》 2018年第4期9-12,共4页 Jiangsu Ship
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献8

  • 1ABS. Analysis procedure manual for the DLA for container carriers[K]. 1995. 被引量:1
  • 2DNV. Fatigue assessment of ship structures[K]. Det Norske Veritas Class Notes No. 30.7, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 3Zhan Zhihu, Gu Yexin. Equivalent design wave approach for global hull analysis[J]. Ship and Ocean Engineering, 2002, 146(3): 14-16. 被引量:1
  • 4CCS, Guidance of direct calculation for container vessel[M]. Beijing: Transportation Press, 2006. 被引量:1
  • 5CCS, Guidance of fatigue strength assessment for ship structure[M]. Beijing: Transportation Press, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 6ABS. Guide for fatigue strength assessment of tanker[K]. 2004. 被引量:1
  • 7Almar-Naess A. Fatigue handbook[K]. Tapir, 1985. 被引量:1
  • 8Zhan Zhihu. A fundamental study on CSR for container ship[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong Univeraity, 2009. 被引量:1

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部