摘要
在进行器官移植手术前,医师负有审查器官捐献人身份的义务,若违反了亲自诊察的注意义务,移植了从不合法途径获得的活体器官,对之并不能一概以"医疗事故罪"追责;若已履行了审查义务,可依据信赖原则阻却"医疗事故罪"的构成要件该当性;若未履行审查义务,则无法以正当业务行为和患者的承诺阻却其违法性,该行为构成"医疗事故罪";若过失移植了未成年人的活体器官,因其不明知或应当知道器官捐献人的年龄,故不能以"故意伤害罪"追责,但如果其未履行形式审查义务,则会构成"医疗事故罪"。
Before performing an organ transplant,doctors are obliged to review the identity of the donor.A physi-cian cannot always be blamed for a medical malpractice if he violates his duty of care to diagnose in person by trans-planting a live organ from an illegal source.If the physician has performed the duty of examination,the constitution of the crime of medical malpractice can be prevented according to the principle of trust.If the physician fails to perform the duty of examination,the illegality cannot be prevented by the legitimate business behavior and the patient's prom-ise,which constitutes the crime of medical malpractice.If the physician negligently transplants the living organ of a minor,because he does not know or should know the donor's age,he cannot be held responsible for intentional injury,but if he fails to perform the duty of formal examination,it will constitute the crime of medical malpractice.
出处
《医学与法学》
2018年第5期6-10,共5页
Medicine and Jurisprudence
关键词
器官移植
医疗事故罪
严重不负责任
信赖原则
organ transplantation
crime of medical malpractice
seriously irresponsible
principle of trust
