摘要
目的:了解跟骨骨折弧形切口及"L"形切口手术疗效对比。方法:对2004年3月-2013年3月我院53例64足跟骨骨折,分别取弧形切口及"L"形切口手术治疗,并进行随访观察。结果:23例29足取"L"形切口,其中6足发生皮缘坏死,坏死率17.2%;30例35足取弧形切口手术内固定治疗,没有发生切口感染和皮肤坏死。结论:弧形手术切口患者,术前准备时间短、术中显露充分、术后感染及坏死率较低。
Objective:To compare the efficacy of surgery with arc incision vs.“L”shaped incision for fracture of calcaneus.Methods:Totally 53 patients with fracture of 64 calcanei admitted to our hospital from March 2004 to March 2013 were treated with surgery with arc incision or“L”shaped incision,and followed up for observation.Results:Totally 23 patients with fracture of 29 feet were treated with surgery with“L”shaped incision;among them,6 feet experienced necrosis in the edge of the skin,and the incidence of necrosis was 17.2%.Totally 30 patients with fracture of 35 feet were treated with surgery with arc incision and internal fixation;among them,no postoperative infection or dermal necrosis was observed.Conclusion:Patients treated with surgery with arc incision had shorter time of preoperative preparation,greater intra-operative exposure,and lower incidences of postoperative infection and necrosis.
出处
《中医临床研究》
2018年第6期134-135,共2页
Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
关键词
跟骨骨折
弧形切口
L形切口
植骨
Fracture of calcaneus
Arc incision
L shaped incision
Bone graft
