摘要
目的:分析剖宫产后疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式的临床效果。方法:选择2015年7月-2017年2月100例剖宫产后疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩产妇并随机分组,每组50例。对照组采用剖宫产妊娠分娩方式,研究组采用阴道妊娠分娩方式。比较两组阴道分娩和对照组剖宫产分娩成功率;分娩出血量、住院时间;产妇新生儿不良事件、产妇不良事件发生率;两组新生儿阿氏评分、新生儿体重。结果:研究组阴道分娩和对照组剖宫产分娩成功率无显著差异,P>0.05;研究组分娩出血量、住院时间低于对照组,P<0.05;研究组新生儿不良事件、产妇不良事件发生率低于对照组,P<0.05。两组新生儿阿氏评分、新生儿体重显著差异,P<0.05。结论:剖宫产后疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式选择阴道分娩可行,可缩短住院时间,减少出血,减少母婴并发症出现,值得推广。
Objective:Analysis of cesarean section of uter-ine scar pregnancy again the clinical effect of childbirth way.Methods:July 2015-February 2017,100 cases of cesarean section scar uterine pregnancy childbirth puerpera and random-ized again,50 cases in each group.Control group is associated pregnancy childbirth way,the team with pregnancy vagina childbirth way.Compare two groups of cesarean section delivery success rate of vaginal delivery and control group;Blood loss,hospital stay,delivery;Maternal newborn incidence of adverse events,maternal adverse events;Two groups of neonatal apgar scoring,neonatal weight.Results:the team success rate of ce-sarean section delivery of vaginal delivery and control group no significant difference,P>0.05;Team delivery blood loss,hos-pital stay,lower than the control group,P<0.05;Team neonatal lower than the control group,the incidence of adverse events,maternal adverse events(P<0.05.Two groups of neonatal ap-gar scoring,neonatal weight there was significant difference,P<0.05).Conclusion:after cesarean section scar uterus vagi-nal delivery is feasible and the pregnancy childbirth way again can shorten the length of hospital stay,reduce bleeding and reduce maternal and infant complications,worthy of promotion.
作者
刘丽
Liu Li(Yingkou Maternity and Children's Hospital,Liaoning(115000))
出处
《黑龙江医药》
CAS
2018年第1期133-135,共3页
Heilongjiang Medicine journal
关键词
剖宫产后疤痕子宫
再次妊娠分娩方式
临床效果
after cesarean section scar uterus
Again the pregnancy childbirth way
Clinical effect
