摘要
目的评价综合护理干预对冠心病患者病情控制及生活质量的影响。方法选择2016年1月—2017年9月该院接收住院治疗的冠心病患者共66例,采用随机数表法,将其分为两组,各33例;对照组实施常规护理干预,观察组实施综合护理干预。应用世卫组织生存质量测定表(WHOQOL-100)在护理前、护理1个月后对两组患者的生活质量状况进行调查评价;比较两组患者的冠心病发作情况及护理前后的生活质量。结果 (1)护理1个月内,观察组心绞痛发作次数为(1.9±0.6)次,明显少于对照组(2.8±1.0)次(P<0.05);(2)护理前,两组患者在生理领域(PHYS)、独立性领域(IND)的生活质量评分对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理1个月后,观察组PHYS评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05),而IND评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论对冠心病患者采用综合护理干预,可有效减少患者发作次数,提高患者生活质量。
Objective To evaluate the effect of general nursing intervention on quality of life of patients with coronary heart failure.Methods 66 cases of patients with coronary heart disease in our hospital from January 2016 to September 2017 were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 33 cases in each,the control group adopted the routine nursing intervention,while the observation group applied the general nursing intervention,and the quality of life of the two groups was investigated by the WHOQOL-100 before nursing and in 1 month after nursing,and the attack of coronary heart disease and quality of life before and after nursing were compared between the two groups.Results The attack frequency of angina in 1 month after nursing in the observation group was obviously lower than that in the control group,[(1.9±0.6)times vs(2.8±1.0)times](P<0.05),before nursing,the differences in the quality of life scores in PHYS and IND fields between the two groups were not obvious,without statistical significance(P>0.05),after 1-month nursing,the PHYS score in the observation group was obviously lower than that in the control group(P<0.05),and the IND score was obviously higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The general nursing intervention in patients with coronary heart disease can effectively reduce the attack frequency of patients and improve the quality of life of patients.
作者
李锡红
LI Xi-hong(Department of Internal Medicine,Sheyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Yancheng,Jiangsu Province,224300 China)
出处
《系统医学》
2017年第22期138-139,142,共3页
Systems Medicine
关键词
综合护理干预
冠心病
生活质量
影响
General nursing intervention
Coronary heart disease
Quality of life
Effect
