期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的效果比较 被引量:11

Clinical comparative analysis of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy in treatment of endometrial cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的临床疗效。方法按照手术方式不同,将140例子宫内膜癌患者分为腹腔镜手术治疗(腹腔镜组)和传统开腹手术治疗(开腹手术组),每组70例。比较2组术中出血量、清扫淋巴结个数、手术时间、盆腹腔引流量、肛门排气时间、术后镇痛药使用、下床活动时间、术后导尿管留置时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症发生率,随访期间2组患者复发、转移情况以及手术前后2组患者血清肿瘤标志物HE4、CA125水平和免疫功能指标IgG、CD_4/CD_8水平。结果 2组术中清扫淋巴结个数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腹腔镜组术中出血量、手术时间、盆腹腔引流量、首次肛门排气时间、术后镇痛药使用、下床活动时间、术后导尿管留置时间、术后住院时间均优于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组并发症发生率为10.00%,显著低于开腹组的25.71%(P<0.05)。随访期间,2组远端转移与局部复发比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。此外,术后2组血清HE4、CA125水平均明显降低(P<0.05),并且腹腔镜组降低水平较开腹组更明显(P<0.05)。术后2组IgG、CD_4/CD_8水平均较术前明显降低,但开腹组中CD_4/CD_8水平降低差异无统计学意义(P<0.05);腹腔镜组IgG、CD_4/CD_8水平改善优于开腹组(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术治疗EC可取得与开腹手术治疗相同的疗效,并具有创伤小、术中出血量少、恢复快、住院时间短,并发症发生率低等优势,值得推广。 Objective To investigate the clinical curative effects of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy in treatment of endometrial cancer(EC).Methods According to different surgical methods,140 patients with EC were divided into laparoscopic surgery group(laparoscopic group)and traditional laparotomy surgery group(laparotomy group),with 70 patients in each group.The intraoperative bleeding volume,the numbers of cleanin lymph nodes,operation time,drainage volume of pelvic cavity and abdominal cavity,the time of anal exhaust,use of analgesics after operation,the time of getting out of bed,indwelling time of catheter after operation,the postoperative hospitalization duration,the incidence rate of postoperative complications,the recurrence and metastasis during follow-up,the serum levels of tumor markers-HE4,CA125 and immunological function indexes including IgG and CD4/CD8 before and after operation were observed and compared between two groups.Results There were no significant differences in the numbers of cleaning lympho nodes between two groups(P>0.05).The intraoperative bleeding volume,operation time,drainage volume of pelvic cavity and abdominal cavity,the time of anal exhaust,use of analgesics after operation,the time of getting out of bed,indwelling time of catheter after operation and hospitalization time in laparoscopic group were superior to those in laparotomy group(P<0.05).The incidence rate of complications in laparoscopic group was 10.00%,which was significantly lower than that(25.715)in laparotomy group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in distal metastasis and local recurrence between two groups(P>0.05).Besides,the serum levels of HE4 and CA125 were significantly decreased after operation in both groups(P<0.05),moreover the decrease degree in laparoscopic group was more obvious than that in laparotomy group(P<0.05).Moreover the levels of IgG and CD4/CD8 were significantly decreased in both groups,as compared with those before operation,moreover,the decrease degree in laparoscopic group was more ob
作者 刘剑煌 吕育纯 李苹 许丽洪 LIU Jianhuang;LV Yuchun;LI Ping(Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,The First Hospital of Quanzhou City,Fujian,Quanzhou 362002,China)
出处 《河北医药》 CAS 2018年第7期974-977,共4页 Hebei Medical Journal
关键词 腹腔镜 开腹手术 子宫内膜癌 临床对比 laparoscope laparotomy endometrial cancer clinical contrast
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献95

  • 1陈晓红,黄浩.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的临床对比分析——前瞻性随机对照研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(3):210-212. 被引量:19
  • 2朱艳宾,刘增佑,柳爱华,俞艇蔚.年轻妇女子宫内膜癌的研究进展[J].河北医药,2005,27(12):935-936. 被引量:2
  • 3丰有吉,沈铿.妇产科学.第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:113-116. 被引量:48
  • 4Obermair A,Janda M,Baker J,et al. Improved surgi-cal safety after laparoscopic compared toopen surgeryfor apparent early stage endometrial cancer: Resultsfrom a randomised controlled trial[J]. European Journalof Cancer,2012 ,48: 1 147-1 153. 被引量:1
  • 5Zullo F,Palomba S,Russo T,et al. A prospectiverandomized comparison between laparoscopic and lapa-rotomic approaches in women with early stage endome-trial cancer: A focus onthe quality of life[J]. AmericanJournal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,2005,193:1 344-1 352. 被引量:1
  • 6Malzoni M, Tinelli R,Cosentino F,et al. Total lapa-roscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomywith lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrialcancer: A prospective randomized study[J]. Gynecolog-ic Oncology ,2009 ,112:126-133. 被引量:1
  • 7Malur S,Possover M,Michels W, et al. Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal versus Abdominal Surgery in Patientswith Endometrial Cancer-A Prospective RandomizedTrial[J]. Gynecologic Oncology,2001,80: 239-244. 被引量:1
  • 8Mourits MJ,Bijen CB,Arts HJ,et al. Safety of lapa-roscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrialcancer: a randomised trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010,11:763-771. 被引量:1
  • 9Parkin DM, Bray F,Ferlay J,et al. Global cancer sta-tistics, 2002 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005, 55 (2): 74-108. 被引量:1
  • 10David Montefiorel E, Rouzierl R,Chapron C,et al.Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy forbenign disorders: a prospective observational study inFrench university hospitals[J]. Hum Repord,2007,22:260-265. 被引量:1

共引文献129

同被引文献93

引证文献11

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部