摘要
目的比较微创髓外固定与髓内固定治疗老年稳定型股骨转子间骨折的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2016年12月我院78例老年稳定型转子间骨折患者的临床资料,其中髓外组(40例)采用微创髓外固定治疗,髓内组(38例)采用髓内固定治疗。比较两组患者的手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、骨折间歇及骨折愈合时间,比较两组患者术后1、3、6个月的髋关节Harris评分、BADL评分、住院时间及住院费用。结果髓外组的切口长度、手术时间及术中出血量均优于髓内组(P<0.05);两组骨折间歇、骨折愈合时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3、6个月,两组患者的Harris评分及BADL评分均升高,差异显著(P<0.05);髓外组术后1、3个月Harris评分及术后1个月BADL评分显著高于髓内组(P<0.05)。髓外组患者的术后住院时间、住院总时间均短于髓内组,术后费用、住院总费用均显著低于髓内组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论微创髓外固定治疗老年稳定型股骨转子间骨折具有创伤小、恢复快、住院时间短、费用低的优点,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the effect of minimally invasive extramedullary and intramedullary fixation in the treatment of elderly stable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.Methods The clinical data of 78 elderly patients with stable intertrochanteric fractures from January 2012 to December 2016 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively.The extramedullary group(40 cases)was treated with minimally invasive extramedullary fixation,and the intramedullary group(38 cases)was treated with intramedullary fixation.The surgical incision length,operation time,intraoperative blood loss,fracture intermission and fracture healing time were compared,and the Harris hip scores,BADL scores,hospital stay and hospitalization costs were compared between the two groups.Results The incision length,operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the extramedullary group were better than those in the intramedullary group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in fracture intermission and fracture healing time between the two groups(P>0.05).At 3 and 6 months after operation,the Harris scores and BADL scores increased significantly in both groups(P<0.05).The Harris scores at 1,3 months after operation and the BADL score at 1 month after operation in the extramedullary group were significantly higher than those in the intramedullary group(P<0.05).The postoperative hospital stay and total hospital stay in the extramedullary group were shorter than those in the intramedullary group,the postoperative cost and the total cost of hospitalization were significantly lower than those in the intramedullary group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Minimally invasive extramedullary fixation for treatment of elderly stable intertrochanteric fractures has the advantages of less trauma,faster recovery,shorter hospital stay and lower cost,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
作者
刘兴国
鱼红进
杨益宏
宋明辉
LIU Xingguo;YU Hongjin;YANG Yihong;SONG Minghui(the First Orthopedics Department,Xian Gaoxin Hospital,Xian 710075,China)
出处
《临床医学研究与实践》
2018年第1期7-9,共3页
Clinical Research and Practice
关键词
微创髓外固定
髓内固定
股骨转子间骨折
minimally invasive extramedullary fixation
intramedullary fixation
intertrochanteric fractures
