摘要
对技术侦查证据的调查核实包括庭上和庭外两种方式,应当以庭上核实为原则,以庭外核实为例外。出于保护特定法益的需要,在法庭之外对技术侦查证据进行核实有其必要。现有庭外核实主要是法院的单方职权行为,行政色彩浓厚,缺少诉讼化程序构造,控辩对抗和有效质证无法落实,程序公开性和正当性难以切实保障。应当完善庭外核实的诉讼化程序,规范庭外核实程序的适用,使之顺应以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革和庭审实质化的要求。
In-court verification and out-of-court verification are the two ways to verify the evidence of technical investigation.the in-court verification should be used as usual and the out-of-court verification must be an exception.It is necessary to verify the evidence of technical investigation outside the court for the purpose of protecting specific interests.Existing out-of-court verification is primarily a court action unilaterally and strongly security administration color.Due to lacking of litigation procedure,the cross-examination between allegation and defendant cannot implement effectively,the transparency and legitimacy of the procedure is difficult to ensure.We should perfect and standardize the litigation procedure of the out-of-court verification,and make it comply with the requirements for the trial-centered reform of the criminal procedure system and the substantiation of court hearing.
出处
《河南社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期49-54,共6页
Henan Social Sciences
基金
证据科学教育部重点实验室(中国政法大学)开放基金资助课题(2014KFKT02)
中国政法大学优秀中青年教师培养支持计划资助项目成果
国家司法文明协同创新中心成果
关键词
技术侦查证据
庭外核实
以审判为中心
诉讼构造
Evidence of Technical Investigation
Outside-court Verification
Trial-centered
Litigation Structure
