期刊文献+

Clinicopathologic features and treatment efficacy of Chinese patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective observational study 被引量:7

Clinicopathologic features and treatment efficacy of Chinese patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer:a retrospective observational study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Background: The prognostic role of the V600 E mutation of v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1(BRAF)in metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) is well established, but the therapeutic regimen targeting this disease is lacking. This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathologic features of and treatment efficacy of commonly used regimens on BRAF-mutated mCRCs.Methods: We collected and reviewed the medical records of mCRC patients treated at Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute(Beijing, China) between July 2011 and July 2016. Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog(KRAS),neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog(NRAS), and BRAF mutational status was assayed using direct sequencing. The details of clinicopathologic characteristics of patients and their responses to FOLFOXIRI regimen or standard therapy were obtained by reviewing the medical records. The progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS)were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test.Results: Of 1694 patients studied, 75 had BRAF exon 15 mutations. Of these 75 patients, 71 had V600 E mutation, 1 had D594 G mutation, 2 had K601 E mutation, and 1 had a novel T599_V600 insAGA alteration. No patients had KRAS or NRAS mutations. Of 63 patients with BRAFV600 E-mutated mCRC and sufficient clinical data, 27(42.9%) had right-sided colon tumors, 19(30.2%) had left-sided colon tumors, and 17(26.9%) had rectal tumors; 26(41.3%) had peritoneal metastases, and 50(79.4%) had distant lymph node metastases.The patients with BRAF K601 E-and T599_V600 insAGA-mutated tumors had similar clinicopathologic features to those with BRAFV600 E-mutated tumors. Patients with the BRAFV600 E mutation benefited more from FOLFOXIRI regimen compared with patients who underwent standard therapy(overall response rate 83.3% vs. 14.0%; median PFS 6.4 months vs. 2.8 months, P = 0.220; median OS11.0 months vs. 6.9 months, P = 0.048).Conclusions: BRAFV600 E mutations were commonly identified in right-sided tumors and showed a high incidence Background: The prognostic role of the V600 E mutation of v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1(BRAF)in metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) is well established, but the therapeutic regimen targeting this disease is lacking. This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathologic features of and treatment efficacy of commonly used regimens on BRAF-mutated mCRCs.Methods: We collected and reviewed the medical records of mCRC patients treated at Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute(Beijing, China) between July 2011 and July 2016. Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog(KRAS),neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog(NRAS), and BRAF mutational status was assayed using direct sequencing. The details of clinicopathologic characteristics of patients and their responses to FOLFOXIRI regimen or standard therapy were obtained by reviewing the medical records. The progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS)were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test.Results: Of 1694 patients studied, 75 had BRAF exon 15 mutations. Of these 75 patients, 71 had V600 E mutation, 1 had D594 G mutation, 2 had K601 E mutation, and 1 had a novel T599_V600 insAGA alteration. No patients had KRAS or NRAS mutations. Of 63 patients with BRAFV600 E-mutated mCRC and sufficient clinical data, 27(42.9%) had right-sided colon tumors, 19(30.2%) had left-sided colon tumors, and 17(26.9%) had rectal tumors; 26(41.3%) had peritoneal metastases, and 50(79.4%) had distant lymph node metastases.The patients with BRAF K601 E-and T599_V600 insAGA-mutated tumors had similar clinicopathologic features to those with BRAFV600 E-mutated tumors. Patients with the BRAFV600 E mutation benefited more from FOLFOXIRI regimen compared with patients who underwent standard therapy(overall response rate 83.3% vs. 14.0%; median PFS 6.4 months vs. 2.8 months, P = 0.220; median OS11.0 months vs. 6.9 months, P = 0.048).Conclusions: BRAFV600 E mutations were commonly identified in right-sided tumors and showed a high incidence
出处 《Chinese Journal of Cancer》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2017年第11期626-634,共9页
关键词 COLORECTAL CANCER BRAF CHEMOTHERAPY PROGNOSIS Colorectal cancer BRAF Chemotherapy Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1Stintzing S, Jung A, Rossius Let al. Analysis of KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in FIRE-3: a randomized phase III study of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab as first-line treatment for wild-type (WT) KRAS (exon 2) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:S8. 被引量:1
  • 2Punt CJA, Simkens LHJ, May A, et al. Updated results including quality of life of the phase III CAIRO 3 study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG): maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizurnab versus observation after induction treatment with chemotherapy and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:S486. 被引量:1
  • 3Bridgewater J, Adam R, Chau I, et al. Updated efficacy/safety findings from a randomized, phase 2 study of bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or FOLFOXIRI in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (OLIVIA study). Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:S483. 被引量:1
  • 4Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, et al. Assessing tumor response beyond RECIST criteria: early tumor shrinkage (ET8) and deepness of response (DpR) in phase III TRIBE trial by the GONO group. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:8491. 被引量:1
  • 5Eric Van Cutsem, Folprecht G, Bokemeyer C, et al. Chemotherapy plus cetuximab as conversion treatment for patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:8490. 被引量:1
  • 6Price T, Peeters M, Kim TW, et al. ASPECCT: a randomized, multicenter, open label, phase 3 study of panitumumab vs cetuximab for previously treated wild type (WT) KRA8 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:89. 被引量:1
  • 7Chang J, Pawar V, Grothey A, et al. Time to health status deterioration in regorafenib-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a post-hoc analysis of the phase III CORRECT study. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:8546. 被引量:1
  • 88chmoll HJ, Haustermans K, Price T, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin versus capecitabine alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: response to the local treatment after chemoradiation and surgery as secondary endpoint. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:8482. 被引量:1
  • 9Sclafani F, Gonzalez D, Cunningham D, et al. TP53 status may predict benefit from cetuximab in high-risk, locally advanced rectal cancer: Results of the EXPERT-C trial. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:84. 被引量:1
  • 10Church D, Domingo E, Sieber 0, et al. Evaluation of PI3KCA mutation as a predictor of benefit from NSAID therapy in colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:8482. 被引量:1

共引文献4

同被引文献39

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部