摘要
目的通过对比危重患者应用悬浮气垫床和普通气垫床时出现压红的时间、部位,比较两种气垫床预防压疮的效果。方法选取长期昏迷或需长期卧床患者32例,随机分为悬浮气垫床组和普通气垫床组。患者平卧于置有地图式测压毯的床垫上,观察患者出现最大压力位置,记录出现最大压力的部位和出现压红的时间。结果患者的压力最大和最早压红的部位均为骶尾部。悬浮气垫床出现压红比普通气垫床晚,但两者均在9 h以上。结论应用气垫床可以有效预防压疮的发生,并减少危重患者翻身的次数;两种不同的气垫床在预防压疮效果方面,悬浮气垫床可能效果更好。
Objective To investigate the effect on the prevention of pressure sore, a comparative study was conducted by comparing the suspension air cushion bed with common air cushion bed on the time of pressing red appearing and position of skin pressing red. Methods Thirty-two consecutive critically ill patients who needed long-term bed rest because of coma were randomly divided into 2 groups: one forsuspension air cushion bed and the other for common air cushion bed. The patients were separately put onthe different air cushion bed and were all with a map type pressure measuring blanket. Then the positions with the maximum pressure were observed, the position and the time of pressing red appearing were all recorded. Results The maximum pressure point and the earliest time of the pressing red appearing were all appeared in the sacroiliac of the patients. No matter which group, the periods from the beginning of the research to the time of the pressing red appearing were more than 9 h. However, compared with the common air cushion bed, the time of pressing red appearing of the suspension air cushion bed was later.Conclusion The using of air cushion bed could prevent the happening of pressure sore effectively and reduce the times of turning over for the critical ill patients. The effect on preventing pressure sore of the suspension air cushion bed might be better than the common air cushion bed.
作者
李童
詹艳春
LI Tong;ZHAN Yan-chun(Department of ICU, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China)
出处
《中国医疗设备》
2017年第2期77-79,86,共4页
China Medical Devices
关键词
压疮
普通气垫床
悬浮气垫床
局部组织损伤
局部组织坏死
pressure sore
the common air cushion bed
the suspension air cushion bed
local tissue injury
local tissue necrosis
