摘要
目的:探讨瘢痕子宫阴道助产分娩与剖宫产分娩的预后。方法:收治子宫瘢痕再次妊娠产妇230例,随机分为对照组与观察组,对照组采用阴道助产分娩,观察组采用剖宫产,比较两组的分娩情况。结果:在对照组,产程、新生儿窒息均明显差于观察组(P<0.01)。观察组的月经恢复时间明显长于对照组(P<0.01)。135例经阴道分娩产妇中,成功122例,剩余13例转为剖腹产。结论:本次研究、分析了经阴道分娩和剖宫产的优劣势,对于临床选择具有一定的指导意义。
Objective:To explore the prognosis of scar uterus with vaginal delivery or cesarean section.Methods:230 cases ofuterine scar pregnant woman with pregnancy again were selected.They were randomly divided into the control group and theobservation group.Patients in the control group were given vaginal delivery,while patients in the observation group were givencesarean section.We compared the effect of the two groups.Results:In the control group,the birth process and neonatal asphyxiawere significantly higher than those in the observation group(P<0.01).In the observation group,menstrual recovery time wassignificantly longer than that of the control group(P<0.01).In 135 cases of vaginal delivery,113 cases were successful,and theremaining 22 cases were converted to cesarean section.Conclusion:This study analyzed the advantages and disadvantages ofvaginal delivery and cesarean section,which had a certain guiding significance for clinical choice.
作者
张方凤
Zhang Fangfeng(Obstetrics Department,the People's Hospital of Mengyin County,Shandong Province 276200)
出处
《中国社区医师》
2016年第14期32-33,共2页
Chinese Community Doctors
关键词
剖宫产
经阴道分娩
瘢痕子宫产妇
Cesarean section
Vaginal delivery
Uterine scar pregnant woman
