摘要
目的:观察研究梗死前心绞痛患者不同临床急诊治疗方法的临床效果。方法:收治梗死前心绞痛患者70例,随机平分为两组。对照组采用常规急诊治疗法,观察组患者在对照组的基础上另采用抗凝、解痉、扩冠的治疗,对比两组患者的临床疗效差异。结果:观察组患者的心肌梗死、心律失常、心力衰竭发生率及总发病率、发生率明显低于对照组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对梗死前心绞痛患者做好相关的抗凝、解痉、扩冠的急诊治疗,可以有效地降低患者心肌梗死、心律失常、心力衰竭及心源性休克的发生率。
Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of different clinical emergency treatment for patients with preinfarction angina.Methods:70 patients with patients with preinfarction angina were selected,they were randomly divided into the two groups on average.Patients in the control group were treated with routine emergency treatment method,patients in the observation group by the treatment of anticoagulation,spasmolysis,expansion of the coronary artery on the basis of the control group,we compared the clinical efficacy differences between the two groups.Results:The incidence of myocardial infarction,arrhythmia,heart failure,and the incidence of total incidence in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Using emergency treatment of anticoagulation,spasmolysis,crown expansion for patients with preinfarction angina can effectively reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction,arrhythmia,heart failure and cardiogenic shock.
作者
李勇
Li Yong(Department of Emergency,the People's Hospital of Bole Prefecture,Xinjiang 833400)
出处
《中国社区医师》
2016年第1期23-23,25,共2页
Chinese Community Doctors
关键词
梗死前心绞痛
急诊治疗
临床疗效
Preinfarction angina
Emergency treatment
Clinical effect
