摘要
本文以中国及韩国高新技术产业集群的代表,即中国北京市的中关村科技园区与韩国大田的大德研究开发特区为分析对象,对两个创新集群基础法律制度方面竞争力优势进行了分析。由于各个园区的发展潜力是与基础法规和中央及地方政府支援政策息息相关的,所以为了支持园区发展,中、韩两国政府在此方面都制定了特有的支援战略。通过对10个法规制度方面的比较分析结果显示,中关村科技园区在七个方面要比大德科技园区更加优越,富有竞争力。简单概括来讲,大德研究开发特区在投资回收的容易性、扶持政策的多样性和通过市场原理的保护及限制制度方面占有相对优势。相反,中关村科技园区在整体法规特性、育成政策、园区内产业设施规模的限制、奖励政策、投诉制度设立、发展基金及财团规模、听证制度建立等七个方面显示出相对优势。
This paper investigates legal competitiveness Zhongguancun Science Park and Daedeok Innoplois,which is representing China and Korea each.The growth potential of these two science towns depends on the legal infrastructure and governmental policies.This is why both countries are focusing on building their own unique pulling strategies in order to develop and promote their own science towns.Out of ten comparison categories,it shows that Zhongguancun Science Park is superior to Daedeok Innopolis,in seven fields.In summary,Zhongguancun Sci- ence Park has legal competitive advantages in comparison with Daedeok Innopolis such as the integrity of related laws in the science town,fostering policies,re- striction of manufacturing facility size,promoting policies,prosecution system, fund and foundation system,and hearing system.On the other hand,Daedeok In- nopolis has legal advantages compared with Zhongguancun Science Park,in re- maining three fields such as divestment,investment-supporting systems and vari- ous protection and prohibition systems.
出处
《制度经济学研究》
2007年第1期186-207,共22页
Research on Institutional Economics
基金
2004年韩国学术振兴财团支持下完成(KRF-2004-005-B00008)。
