期刊文献+

从股东代表诉讼看股东代表仲裁 被引量:2

Comment on Shareholder Representative Arbitration from the Perspective of Shareholder Representative Litigation
原文传递
导出
摘要 《公司法》明确引入了股东代表诉讼,使适格股东可以在公司受到损害时寻求司法的保护。而《民事案件案由规定》将股东代表诉讼列为专门的案由更是实现了该诉讼由纸面至实践的完美转身。但对股东代表仲裁,除了个别学者在公司法著作中轻描淡写带过之外,无论是司法机构还是仲裁机构均没有回应。本文从美国股东代表仲裁的演变出发,针对我国股东代表诉讼的现状,论述了我国股东代表仲裁的可行性,并进而引申出如何在公司经营中运用股东代表仲裁以及运用过程中应注意的问题。 The Company Law of the People's Republic of China introduces shareholder representative litigation expressly,which makes the eligible shareholder can seek judicial protection when the company was given the loss.The Main Points of Civil Cases stipulates shareholder representative litigation as special main points.Now shareholder representative litigation realizes the practical enforceability.But except some scholar,shareholder representative arbitration has been referred to very little,neither judicial organization nor arbitration organization.This paper illustrates the evolution of shareholder representative arbitration in American,aims at the present circumstances of shareholder representative litigation in China,expounds the feasibility of shareholder representative arbitration and extends to how to apply shareholder representative arbitration in corporation governance and the key points in the process of application.
作者 张贝
出处 《仲裁研究》 2008年第3期28-32,共5页 Arbitration Study
关键词 股东代表诉讼 股东代表仲裁 公司法 Shareholder Representative Litigation Shareholder Representative Arbitration The Company Law of the People's Republic of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1.Shareholders Derivative Litigation,No.91 Cir.5500(RPP),1994 WL 533595(S.D.N.Y.Sept.30,1994)[].. 被引量:1
  • 2.Shearson v.McMahon[].US; SCt.1987 被引量:1
  • 3.Fed.Sec.L.Rep.(CCH)198,454(S.D.N.Y.Sept.30,1994)[].. 被引量:1
  • 4.Wilko v. Swan[].US.1953 被引量:1

同被引文献14

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部